Discuss mailing list

[sjeap <sjeap AT lavabit.com>]

Hello,

In such cases one may shouldn't ask by standard contact forms but
somehow get an email address from one of the responsible persons.

Additionally one could complain again by:
http://reports.internic.net/cgi/registrars/problem-report.cgi
http://www.icann.org/en/help/ombudsman/contact

Regards sjeap

Am 16.07.2012 18:34, schrieb David Norman:
>> It's possible the people you talk to don't realize there could be any
>> other domain system than ICANN's.
>>
> Alexander Nordlund <alexander.nordlund AT opennicproject.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello everyone,
> 
>  
> 
> Just wanted to let you all know that I’ve made an inquiry to ICANN
> regarding the new gTLDs.
> 
> The answer we got was… less than satisfactory.
> 
>  
> 
> And I never received a reply to my follow up.
> 
>  
> 
> Anyone have any recommendations on how to proceed?
> 
> Anyone reckon we should ask EFF for help?
> 
>  
> 
> ---
> 
> Alexander Nordlund
> 
> alexander.nordlund AT opennicproject.org
> <mailto:alexander.nordlund AT opennicproject.org>
> 
> @bordslampa
> 
>  
> 
> *From:*Alexander Nordlund [mailto:alexander.nordlund AT opennicproject.org]
> *Sent:* den 7 juli 2012 02:45
> *To:* 'New gTLD Customer Service'
> *Cc:* Alex Hanselka; Tim Groeneveld; Julian DeMarchi
> *Subject:* RE: New gTLD Customer Service Case
> 
>  
> 
> Hello,
> 
>  
> 
> Thank you for your reply, unfortunately I cannot see a clear response in it.
> 
>  
> 
> Could you please clarify your stance on the collisions that the new
> gTLDs may cause?
> 
>  
> 
> ---
> 
> Alexander Nordlund
> 
> alexander.nordlund AT opennicproject.org
> <mailto:alexander.nordlund AT opennicproject.org>
> 
> @bordslampa
> 
>  
> 
> *From:*New gTLD Customer Service [mailto:NewgTLD AT icann.org]
> <mailto:[mailto:NewgTLD AT icann.org]>
> *Sent:* den 6 juli 2012 12:01
> *To:* Alexander
> *Subject:* New gTLD Customer Service Case
> 
>  
> 
> Dear Alexander Nordlund:
> 
> Thank you for contacting New gTLD Customer Service. This is an update to
> your recently submitted inquiry:
> 
> *Inquiry Submission Date:* 04/07/2012 01:52
> *Case ID*: 29821
> *Subject:* Question about gTLD collisions.
> *Inquiry Category:* Objections / Dispute Resolution
> *Inquiry Status:* In Progress
> 
>  
> 
> *Inquiry Update:*
> 
> Thank you for contacting New gTLD Customer Service.
> 
> You may refer to IANA's database of top level domains for a complete
> listing of top level domains at
> http://www.iana.org/domains/root/db/(root zones that are currently
> delegated).
> 
> Please note that part of the Initial Evaluation process for all
> applications includes a review for string similarity. Please refer to
> Module 1 of the Applicant Guidebook
> http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agbfor more details as to what
> is involved in this process.
> 
> Please let us know if you have any further questions.
> 
>  
> 
> *Description: *
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 
> 
> Quickly looking over the list published in
> /newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/application-results/strings-120
> 0utc-13jun12-en?tag=mncol;txt>
> http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/application-results/strings-1200
> utc-13jun12-en?tag=mncol;txt I can spot applications for two TLDs which have
> already been operated for a long time by the OpenNIC project.
> 
> .free and .ing
> 
> 
> 
> If these gTLDs were to be incorporated into ICANN you would be creating a
> conflict which would mean extra work and implications (at least on one of
> the sides).
> 
> 
> 
> So we are wondering, what is your stance regarding the collisions?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> 
> Alexander Nordlund
> 
> alexander.nordlund AT opennicproject.org
> <mailto:alexander.nordlund AT opennicproject.org>
> 
> @bordslampa
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Regards,
> 
> New gTLD Customer Service
> 
>  
> 
> /DISCLAIMER: This email is for information only and does not represent
> of all requirements and criteria that the applicant must satisfy. ICANN
> is not providing legal, financial, business or any other kind of advice.
> This email does not represent a modification to the Applicant Guidebook,
> or the terms and conditions to the new gTLD program. This email also
> does not represent a waiver of any ICANN policy, procedure or agreement.
> In the event that any information provided in this email appears to be
> inconsistent with any information published elsewhere by ICANN, please
> do not rely on this email without confirmation or clarification from ICANN./