Discuss mailing list

[Jamyn Shanley <jshanley AT gmail.com>]

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Brian Koontz <brian AT opennicproject.org> wrote:

On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 11:24:53AM -0500, Aaron J. Angel wrote:
> That seems a masochistic duplication of effort.  What am I missing?
>

Explain?

The vast majority of OpenNIC information could (should?) be put on the website, and not a wiki. Essentially there's core information that needs to be communicated, and all of that could be put on a website (dynamic or not):

a) Client: setup

b) Server: setup

c) OpenNIC news

d) Status: Tier 1/2 servers

The only one that would really need to be 'dynamic' would be server status, and it doesn't matter where/how those checks run - the results could be saved to a static (web) page if need be, that was updated regularly via cron or whatever. Any other things (administrative tasks) don't really need to be public, so whether a wiki is used for that or not doesn't matter.