Discuss mailing list

[Travis McCrea <me AT travismccrea.com>]

Well we could always use a fallback and say that it is creative commons BY 
where public domain isn't legally acceptable. However, I think that getting 
consensus on any (incredibly) liberal rights notice is going to be difficult. 
I would say CC BY is not restrictive and allows us to get credit when our 
work is used. However, I think we should also agree to not actively try to 
enforce this license and have it up to encourage people to share our work and 
link back -- and not sue our users for sharing about OpenNIC

Quinn Wood wrote:
> On 01/01/2013 12:53 PM, Travis McCrea wrote:
>> I would, of course, support the kopimi license (as it is a large part
>> of my system of faith). However, there really isn't that much of a
>> difference between Kopimi and Public Domain other than shock value.
>>
> Yeah, they're both pretty much unusable. Since, for whatever reason,
> legal systems refuse to acknowledge the concept of wanting your shit
> to be WTFPL.
>