Discuss mailing list

[Quinn Wood <wood.quinn.s AT gmail.com>]

On 01/02/2013 10:18 AM, Aaron Angel wrote:
> As it stands right now, I would think the content's author would hold the
> copyright, until it is assigned to someone else.  And, despite prior
> discussions that suggest the contrary, the legal status of OpenNIC still
> seems fuzzy to me, since it has yet to be registered anywhere as anything.
You can't grant a copyright-based monopoly to anything but a natural 
person or a registered entity. Hopefully the site won't display anything 
stupid like

"Copyright <?php date('Y'); ?> http://opennicproject.org";

--
Quinn
http://woodquinn.x10.mx