discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Stefan Sabolowitsch <Stefan.Sabolowitsch AT felten-group.com>
- To: "discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org" <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 06:53:15 +0000
- Accept-language: de-DE, en-US
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=feltengroup_com; d=felten-group.com; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=lbCbtmbV7j8w5FiFerGutvXBrrA32v8PA6CH/wwNknMNmxqywFsAsTjMBOdO F7zGmFX4dVJQxgzi3ajnhWB1MhykrZIPfgTR70UhqFiGBgVralT/tmu/2 HCjT2F5NmYPWZ1jJv9tUIjiwwpvEHlOOHY0RBGgXAyJmDnU9UIvUN0=;
- Vbr-info: md=felten-group.com; mc=all; mv=vbr.emailcertification.org;
Hi guys.
Why do you make your life not something easier?
rate-limit and anti-spoof are OK and important, but what really helps is
DNS dampening.
http://lutz.donnerhacke.de/eng/Blog/DNS-Dampening
It will be as a plugin in the upcoming release of Bind v10.
http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/2840
It's really works, look here "5.1k Dampening" requests per second
http://www.pic-upload.de/view-18968967/DNS_Dampening.png.html
should someone need help, just ask me maybe i can help here.
Regards,
Stefan
Am 16.04.13 07:02 schrieb "Tim Groeneveld" unter <tim AT timgws.com.au>:
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> > Rate-limiting is the best first-step in this game. Even if you
>> > can't
>> > prevent your server from being used in an attack, you can at least
>> > greatly limit the actual damage being done to yourself and the
>> > intended target. I would highly recommend that ALL public DNS
>> > servers implement some manner of rate limiting.
>>
>>
>> This is correct.
>>
>
>Also, of note, there is a patch for BIND 9 rate limiting,
>which can be found here
>
>http://ss.vix.su/~vjs/rrlrpz.html
>
>Regards,
>Tim
>
>
>--------
>You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>You may unsubscribe by emailing
>discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
- [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Guillaume Parent, 04/15/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Kenny Taylor, 04/15/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, David Norman, 04/15/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Jeff Taylor, 04/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Tim Groeneveld, 04/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Tim Groeneveld, 04/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Stefan Sabolowitsch, 04/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Futuro, 04/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Jeff Taylor, 04/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Guillaume Parent, 04/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Jeff Taylor, 04/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Jamyn Shanley, 04/17/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Julian DeMarchi, 04/17/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, mike, 04/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Stefan Sabolowitsch, 04/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Stefan Sabolowitsch, 04/17/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, mike, 04/17/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Guillaume Parent, 04/17/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Tim Groeneveld, 04/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Tim Groeneveld, 04/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Jeff Taylor, 04/16/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.