discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:20:08 -0600
But that still requires manual compilation. What about those who
rely on package managers to keep them up to date on security
patches? On 04/16/2013 03:03 PM, Guillaume
Parent wrote:
There are backported patches for 9.7 and 9.8 too if
you don't want to run bind 9.9.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Jeff
Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>
wrote:
It sounds great, and for many people this would be a good solution... Except that from what I'm reading, the only way to get it is to compile the bleeding-edge BIND, which most people aren't going to do. The other issue I see is that this is a BIND-only solution. What about those of us who use dedicated firewalls and don't want the excessive traffic flooding our internal networks? I prefer to stop as much garbage as possible at the firewall, then use BIND based solutions as a backup to catch whatever else gets through. On 04/16/2013 12:53 AM, Stefan Sabolowitsch wrote: > Hi guys. > Why do you make your life not something easier? > rate-limit and anti-spoof are OK and important, but what really helps is > DNS dampening. > > http://lutz.donnerhacke.de/eng/Blog/DNS-Dampening > > It will be as a plugin in the upcoming release of Bind v10. > > > > http://bind10.isc.org/ticket/2840 > > It's really works, look here "5.1k Dampening" requests per second > http://www.pic-upload.de/view-18968967/DNS_Dampening.png.html > > > should someone need help, just ask me maybe i can help here. > > > Regards, > Stefan > --------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org |
- [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Guillaume Parent, 04/15/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Kenny Taylor, 04/15/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, David Norman, 04/15/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Jeff Taylor, 04/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Tim Groeneveld, 04/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Tim Groeneveld, 04/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Stefan Sabolowitsch, 04/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Futuro, 04/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Jeff Taylor, 04/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Guillaume Parent, 04/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Jeff Taylor, 04/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Jamyn Shanley, 04/17/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Julian DeMarchi, 04/17/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, mike, 04/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Stefan Sabolowitsch, 04/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Stefan Sabolowitsch, 04/17/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, mike, 04/17/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Guillaume Parent, 04/17/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Alex M (Coyo), 04/17/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Killman BOFH, 04/18/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Kenny Taylor, 04/18/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Killman BOFH, 04/18/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Tim Groeneveld, 04/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Tim Groeneveld, 04/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] DoS amp attack today, Jeff Taylor, 04/16/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.