Discuss mailing list

[Peter Green <peter AT greenpete.free>]

On 21/01/14 08:34, Quinn Wood wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Daniel Quintiliani <danq AT runbox.com> 
> wrote:
>> I propose OpenNIC sets up a Bugzilla subdomain on opennicproject.org,
>> where we can make "enhancement" suggestions (e.g. proposed OpenNIC TLDs,
>> ICANN's new TLDs, the DDoS problem) and can use "vote for enhancement"
>> before a specified date as a way to decide OpenNIC policy, or to reopen
>> previous decisions.
>>
> I would not be against this at this time, but I'd like to see a
> running instance that's been catered to OpenNIC before voting.
> (Paradox, anyone? :D)
> 

I'm a little confused here, why does there have to be a running instance
before we decide to implement something?

Surely we set up an instance and play with it to see how it goes. If it
seems good we go live, (possibly after a vote).

Take for instance when we updated the main site, I set up a demo site
that I worked on it in collaboration with the group until it was ready
and then moved the work over to the live site. Why can't someone, (i.e.
the proposer) set up a demo instance and let us test it out?

Peter

Mmm, not sure about bottom posting... ;-)