Discuss mailing list

["Jerry Pipes" <domains AT snewpy.com>]

We followed this same workflow, more or less, the last time we voted, but 
you're right, it isn't written down anywhere.

I have no issues with it.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Julian De Marchi" <julian AT jdcomputers.com.au>
To: <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 4:27 AM
Subject: [opennic-discuss] Voting


> heya--
>
> With the recent and past confusions with voting, it's time to solve this
> problem. The problem isn't the voting system however, it's the workflow.
>
> I've looked for a voting policy for OpenNIC and I can't find one. I'd
> like help to create one so we don't get into this confused state again.
>
> We can first talk/debate(!=flame) the workflow and then build a policy
> around that.
>
> The current(un-documented) workflow is this. propose idea on m/l ->
> discuss idea for 7 days -> some one calls a vote -> vote gets seconded
> -> vote established(7days) -> vote closes -> winner announced
>
> Any thoughts on the current workflow?
>
> --julian


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing 
> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org