Discuss mailing list

[Christopher <weblionx AT gmail.com>]

I'm okay with that work flow.

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Jerry Pipes <domains AT snewpy.com> wrote:
> We followed this same workflow, more or less, the last time we voted, but
> you're right, it isn't written down anywhere.
>
> I have no issues with it.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Julian De Marchi"
> <julian AT jdcomputers.com.au>
> To: <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 4:27 AM
> Subject: [opennic-discuss] Voting
>
>
>
>> heya--
>>
>> With the recent and past confusions with voting, it's time to solve this
>> problem. The problem isn't the voting system however, it's the workflow.
>>
>> I've looked for a voting policy for OpenNIC and I can't find one. I'd
>> like help to create one so we don't get into this confused state again.
>>
>> We can first talk/debate(!=flame) the workflow and then build a policy
>> around that.
>>
>> The current(un-documented) workflow is this. propose idea on m/l ->
>> discuss idea for 7 days -> some one calls a vote -> vote gets seconded
>> -> vote established(7days) -> vote closes -> winner announced
>>
>> Any thoughts on the current workflow?
>>
>> --julian
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>>
>>
>> --------
>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> You may unsubscribe by emailing
>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>
>
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>