discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Tim Groeneveld <tim AT timg.ws>
- To: "discuss" <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .GO
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:10:53 +1000
I vote no purely on technical grounds.
Two letter TLDs are reserved for country codes.
Regards,
Tim
---- On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:53:59 +1000 Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>wrote ----
I have to wonder, what do you actually know about the opennic project? Do you understand how DNS works? Your idea of charging for *any* domains suggests that you want to make money while depending on the free services of other members' servers, and that fact that you weren't aware of that makes me think you haven't done any research into what you are proposing.Additionally, who do you think is going to buy a domain on opennic? Do you understand that in order to view opennic domains, you have to modify your computer to use our DNS servers? This isn't just affecting you, as the owner of the TLD, it affects EVERYONE who wants to visit the websites built on opennic domains. You can't just go to google and expect to click on a link for an opennic domain, and they will never show up in any of the search engines.People are willing to pay around $10 for a domain name that can be viewed world-wide. Who is going to pay for a domain that can only be viewed by a small subset of technically-oriented people?On 08/25/2016 08:50 PM, hemantbharti2003 AT gmail.com wrote:Hi All I was not aware about the DNS servers is by members, in that case i will propose to reduce the cost to be zero for 1-2 char domain-------- You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org--------You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .GO, (continued)
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .GO, Bart Smienk, 08/25/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .GO, hemantbharti2003, 08/25/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .GO, vv, 08/25/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .GO, Daniel Quintiliani, 08/25/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .GO, hemantbharti2003, 08/25/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .GO, hemantbharti2003, 08/25/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .GO, Daniel Quintiliani, 08/25/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .GO, hemantbharti2003, 08/25/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .GO, Daniel Quintiliani, 08/25/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .GO, Daniel Quintiliani, 08/25/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .GO, hemantbharti2003, 08/25/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .GO, Jeff Taylor, 08/26/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .GO, Tim Groeneveld, 08/26/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .GO, Jeff Taylor, 08/26/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .GO, Bart Smienk, 08/25/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.