Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] Please submit proposals here for a TLD to replace .free

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] Please submit proposals here for a TLD to replace .free


Chronological Thread 
  • From: <vv AT cgs.pw>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Please submit proposals here for a TLD to replace .free
  • Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 14:47:31 -0800

I've found little sympathy for OpenNIC anywhere
except on this list. I doubt the EFF would be
any different. People generally believe that
the net will be broken, and many have a strong
negative feeling toward us.

~ Ole


On Mon, 05 Dec 2016 16:18:59 -0500 (EST)
"Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:

> Wouldn't we have more luck speaking with the EFF?
>
> --
>
> -Dan Q
>
>
> On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 16:14:51 -0500, Theo B
> <me AT theos.space> wrote:
>
> > Are we going to say/ask anything to Amazon? Maybe
> > they'd be willing to help us out in some way.
> >
> > -Theo
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Jeff Taylor
> > <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net> wrote:
> > > On 12/04/2016 01:23 AM, Maiyannah Bishop wrote:
> > >
> > > Personally, I'm in favour of keeping .free and
> > > letting ICANN explain to people why there's
> > > collisions. Are we going to just roll over the moment
> > > ICANN takes up a TLD that conflicts? Because if so,
> > > then we may as well not even bother with operating,
> > > because we'll be dead the moment they reopen gTLD
> > > applications next year. -mb
> > >
> > >
> > > I believe we had that exact same discussion the last
> > > time they opened up gTLD applications, and a few
> > > people bemoaned the end of opennic... yet here we
> > > still are. There was one other zone that collided
> > > -- .ing -- which was added to the root zone in
> > > January 2014 but still doesn't appear to be open for
> > > domain registration. It may be that .free follows
> > > the same path and doesn't see any actual use for some
> > > time.
> > >
> > > As for ICANN explaining why they have TLD
> > > collisions... who do you think they're going to
> > > explain it to? It's not like anything in the opennic
> > > root zone has any affect on ICANN's root, nor on the
> > > people who still using the ICANN root. Nobody is
> > > going to complain because nobody except opennic users
> > > are even aware of the collision.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --------
> > > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> > > You may unsubscribe by emailing
> > > discuss-unsubscribe@lists. opennicproject.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --------
> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> > You may unsubscribe by emailing
> > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page