discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: <vv AT cgs.pw>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] .core TLD Proposal
- Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 12:20:23 -0800
There are people on IRC most of the time. I monitor
it about 12 hours of the day. Whoever you "advised"
you that it is not worth going there is a goof.
If you don't know "what you would have said" on IRC
something is wrong with this. IRC is a place to have
a conversations and it is more casual and easier to
throw ideas around than email is.
On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 17:01:59 +0000
Joseph Marsden <josephmarsden AT towerdevs.xyz> wrote:
> On what website said that it is no cost? We don’t even
> have an official website for CoreDomain yet. Also I don’t
> know what I would have said on IRC, someone also advised
> me that it’s not worth coming on because nobody’s ever
> online.
>
> From: discuss-request AT lists.opennicproject.org
> [mailto:discuss-request AT lists.opennicproject.org] On
> Behalf Of Theo B Sent: 04 February 2017 4:05 PM To:
> discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org Subject: Re:
> [opennic-discuss] .core TLD Proposal
>
> I'm also super hesitant to vote for anything to do with
> you, because you kinda came out of the blue. Most people
> come on IRC and talk a bit with other people, instead of
> just joining and immediately starting a TLD. I also am
> very sketched out by the fact that you originally
> "reserved the right to raise prices" considering that on
> the website it literally says: "No Cost (Gratis)".
>
> Just my 2 cents.
>
> -Theo
>
> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 1:23 AM,
> <josephmarsden AT towerdevs.xyz<mailto:josephmarsden AT towerdevs.xyz>>
> wrote: I'm sorry that the management of TOWER wasn't
> clear to you - we have other members too that are not
> listed on the page. We'll try our best to update it with
> newer information. To be honest, that website's pretty
> old.
>
> As for the use case, I'm sure I made it clear in the
> charter - .core is intended to be used for use cases
> related to servers, blogs, and server hosting. It's for a
> much wider range of uses than just advertising.
>
> And also, yes, TOWER has full administrative control over
> CoreDomain, but this is a neccessity to protect ourselves
> in case of a legal issue. It will never be used to
> micromanage or remove staff.
>
> I'll work on the email issue too. I'm thinking about
> placing all of the contact addresses under one universal
> @core.towerdevs.xyz<http://core.towerdevs.xyz> address.
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing
> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org<mailto:discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org>
>
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .core TLD Proposal, (continued)
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .core TLD Proposal, Christopher, 02/03/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .core TLD Proposal, JC, 02/03/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .core TLD Proposal, Jonah Aragon, 02/03/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .core TLD Proposal, vv, 02/04/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .core TLD Proposal, Verax, 02/04/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .core TLD Proposal, josephmarsden, 02/04/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .core TLD Proposal, Theo B, 02/04/2017
- RE: [opennic-discuss] .core TLD Proposal, Joseph Marsden, 02/04/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .core TLD Proposal, Daniel Quintiliani, 02/04/2017
- RE: [opennic-discuss] .core TLD Proposal, Joseph Marsden, 02/04/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .core TLD Proposal, vv, 02/04/2017
- Message not available
- Re[2]: [opennic-discuss] .core TLD Proposal, Theo B., 02/04/2017
- RE: [opennic-discuss] .core TLD Proposal, Joseph Marsden, 02/04/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .core TLD Proposal, Joseph Marsden, 02/04/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] .core TLD Proposal, vv, 02/03/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.