discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Jon Hebb <somebodyrocks AT gmail.com>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Status on .o TLD?
- Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:30:01 -0400
There is no voting before a formal vote is proposed followed by a discussion.
If we want to argue semantics and rules, let's atleast abide by our own.
On Apr 20, 2017 3:57 PM, "Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:
I vote Yes to remove .o and vote Yes to require a functioning registrar. If a functioning registrar comes into being, then we can vote for/against .o again.
--
-Dan Q
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 10:36:17 -0600, Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net> wrote:
> So it's been another three months and there has still been no indication
> of any progress on actually getting a functional TLD in place. Jonah
> you seem to have time for every project under the sun, including your
> seemingly personal goal of restructuring all of opennic, but you never
> have time to actually complete the first project you signed up for.
>
> Is it time to call for a no-confidence vote? Personally I think the
> records for .o should have been removed from opennic months ago when the
> registrar system never materialized.
>
> And in the future I would like to propose that we make it a requirement
> to show a functioning registrar BEFORE calling a vote for any new TLDs.
> Seriously, this has gone beyond ridiculous.
>
>
>
> On 01/10/2017 08:56 PM, Jonah Aragon wrote:
> > On Jan 10, 2017 9:38 PM, "Jeff Taylor" <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net
> > <mailto:shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>> wrote:
> >
> > Who was supposed to be in charge of that namespace and where did
> > they go? Anyone remember?
> >
> >
> > Me.
> >
> > And fortunately enough I'm still around ;)
> >
> > We're a bit behind schedule with the system, but it shouldn't be cause
> > for concern, everything will be handled soon; OpenNIC is great but I
> > can't devote 100% of my time to this project, with it's relatively
> > small community and all; I'm sure you and many other T1/T2 community
> > members understand.
> >
> > Jonah
> >
> > P.S. Voted upon Charter: "Registrations immediately after approval
> > will be handled manually via email. An automated registration system
> > is in development and will be available at tld.o when it becomes
> > available."
> >
> > Sent from my Google Pixel
> >
> >
> >
> > --------
> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> > You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status on .o TLD?, Jeff Taylor, 04/20/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status on .o TLD?, Daniel Quintiliani, 04/20/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status on .o TLD?, Jon Hebb, 04/20/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status on .o TLD?, Jeff Taylor, 04/20/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status on .o TLD?, Jonah Aragon, 04/20/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status on .o TLD?, Jeff Taylor, 04/21/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status on .o TLD?, Jon Hebb, 04/21/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status on .o TLD?, Zach Gibbens, 04/30/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status on .o TLD?, mk, 04/23/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status on .o TLD?, Jon Hebb, 04/21/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status on .o TLD?, Jeff Taylor, 04/21/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status on .o TLD?, Jonah Aragon, 04/20/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status on .o TLD?, Jeff Taylor, 04/20/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status on .o TLD?, Jon Hebb, 04/20/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status on .o TLD?, Christopher, 04/20/2017
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Status on .o TLD?, Daniel Quintiliani, 04/20/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.