Discuss mailing list

[Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>]

Yeah I wasn't saying that my message was declaring an open vote, only that this is an issue that needs to be brought up and discussed.

And frankly, I think I'm even more worried that there is suddenly an operational registrar running only a few hours after my initial email.  How long have you had functional code sitting around?  Why is it that you've been pouring so much energy into all these other projects, but you couldn't get this one online first?  And what assurances do we have that you'll follow up with getting it closer to full functionality, rather than just dropping it again so you can play with other projects?

I have a lot of concern over how you've managed this TLD to date, and that quickly spills over into concerns about every other project you're working on for opennic.  It's great that you have the energy to try making things better, but please try actually completing one major project before moving on to something else.

On 04/20/2017 02:30 PM, Jon Hebb wrote:

There is no voting before a formal vote is proposed followed by a discussion.

If we want to argue semantics and rules, let's atleast abide by our own.

On Apr 20, 2017 3:57 PM, "Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com> wrote: I vote Yes to remove .o and vote Yes to require a functioning registrar. If a functioning registrar comes into being, then we can vote for/against .o again.

--

-Dan Q


On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 10:36:17 -0600, Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net> wrote:

> So it's been another three months and there has still been no indication
> of any progress on actually getting a functional TLD in place.  Jonah
> you seem to have time for every project under the sun, including your
> seemingly personal goal of restructuring all of opennic, but you never
> have time to actually complete the first project you signed up for.
>
> Is it time to call for a no-confidence vote?  Personally I think the
> records for .o should have been removed from opennic months ago when the
> registrar system never materialized.
>
> And in the future I would like to propose that we make it a requirement
> to show a functioning registrar BEFORE calling a vote for any new TLDs.
> Seriously, this has gone beyond ridiculous.
>
>
>
> On 01/10/2017 08:56 PM, Jonah Aragon wrote:
> > On Jan 10, 2017 9:38 PM, "Jeff Taylor" <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net
> > <mailto:shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>> wrote:
> >
> >     Who was supposed to be in charge of that namespace and where did
> >     they go? Anyone remember?
> >
> >
> > Me.
> >
> > And fortunately enough I'm still around ;)
> >
> > We're a bit behind schedule with the system, but it shouldn't be cause
> > for concern, everything will be handled soon; OpenNIC is great but I
> > can't devote 100% of my time to this project, with it's relatively
> > small community and all; I'm sure you and many other T1/T2 community
> > members understand.
> >
> > Jonah
> >
> > P.S. Voted upon Charter: "Registrations immediately after approval
> > will be handled manually via email. An automated registration system
> > is in development and will be available at tld.o when it becomes
> > available."
> >
> > Sent from my Google Pixel
> >
> >
> >
> > --------
> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> > You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org





--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org

--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org