Discuss mailing list

[Brutalent <brutalent AT email.com>]

With 1 year old Twitter account with 200 followers minimum prevent a spam registration of ORK domain. Do you like?

2017-09-28 15:21 GMT+02:00 Brutalent <brutalent AT email.com>:

Thanks guys for comments. We want operate with ORK tld for high security, it's not a blockchain, is a "Operative Ring Key" for identificate a single domain as single ID. Who want register an ORK domain, the name of TLD is hardware random (based on algorythm). Example: efsdafdsa.ork

2017-09-28 3:01 GMT+02:00 Christopher <weblionx AT gmail.com>:

My main question is, let's say we all vote yes, what would happen
next? How do you plan on using the new TLD? How would one register
since it's a blockchain? Etc.

Side note, regarding what Ole said, you can (and I recommend) call a
vote for a longer period of time than a day. I would recommend at
least 5 days, if not 7. Rushing is generally frowned upon.

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Daniel Quintiliani <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:
> Bringing back the mailing list arguments proposing ending Namecoin peering. The "optional blacklist" proposal won out, let's leave it at that.
>
> --
>
> -Dan Q
>
>
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 18:19:42 -0600, Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net> wrote:
>
>> I'm curious what I said that was either confrontational or untrue?
>>
>>
>> On 09/27/2017 06:02 PM, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
>> > Oh don't start this again. We already gave you a blacklist.
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > -Dan Q
>> >
>> > On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 17:47:16 -0600, Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> They don't.  The operators aren't even willing to try.  This is the main
>> >> reason why it has been discussed several times whether opennic should
>> >> continue to peer with .bit -- because our server admins are being
>> >> affected by the abuse and the anonymity of blockchain domains prevent
>> >> any chance of holding a person accountable for intentional damages.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 09/27/2017 05:42 PM, Rouben wrote:
>> >>> I’m genuinely curious, how do .bit domains solve this issue? Aren’t
>> >>> they governed in a similar fashion through NameCoin?
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 19:36 Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net
>> >>> <mailto:shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>      You didn't answer how you intend to *prevent* scams and malware on
>> >>>      domains if nobody can contact the owners.
>> >>>
>> >>>      On 09/27/2017 04:41 PM, Brutalent wrote:
>> >>>>      Ok we want create a ORK Tld register. We host the server and
>> >>>>      project. Not want scam or malware, want use ORK Tld for id with
>> >>>>      redeable webpages.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>      Il 27/set/2017 23:53, "Jeff Taylor" <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net
>> >>>>      <mailto:shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>> ha scritto:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>          How do you propose to prevent abuse similar to what we are
>> >>>>          currently seeing with .bit domains?  If you are trying to
>> >>>>          obfuscate the domain information, how will individuals be
>> >>>>          held responsible for damaging botnets or distributing
>> >>>>          malware?  If you cannot identify the owner of a domain, will
>> >>>>          YOU be taking personal responsibility for their content and
>> >>>>          any damages done?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>          You said you need OpenNIC support to regulate the ID
>> >>>>          addresses.  I assume these ID's will correspond to individual
>> >>>>          domains?  What role do you expect OpenNIC to play in
>> >>>>          regulating the addresses? OpenNIC will not host servers for
>> >>>>          you, nor will anyone write software for your project.
>> >>>>          OpenNIC provides DNS only, the rest is your own responsibility.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>          On 09/27/2017 02:46 PM, Brutalent wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>              Sorry, but not know voting system. This is OpenNIC. Why
>> >>>>              don't like ORK project? I'm serious and we don't want
>> >>>>              create a partnership. We make a simply TLD for support
>> >>>>              it. Thanks.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>          --------
>> >>>>          You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> >>>>          You may unsubscribe by emailing
>> >>>>          discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>> >>>>          <mailto:discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>      --------
>> >>>>      You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> >>>>      You may unsubscribe by emailingdiscuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>> >>>>      <mailto:discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org>
>> >>>
>> >>>      --------
>> >>>      You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> >>>      You may unsubscribe by emailing
>> >>>      discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>> >>>      <mailto:discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>>
>> >>> Rouben
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --------
>> >>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> >>> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>> >>
>> >> --------
>> >> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> >> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --------
>> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> > You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>
>>
>> --------
>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
>
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>

--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org