Discuss mailing list

[Mike Wille <mike AT wille.io>]

Hi, 

is there a White Paper about your TLD project which is based on ORK? (Not the White Paper for ORK, please)

Also: If you start a vote now then I think everyone would vote "no", as nobody knows what you are trying to accomplish.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / with best regards,

Mike Lennart Wille, wille.io

E-Mail:  mike AT wille.io

PGP-Key: wille.io/pgp

This email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended addressee, or if the information provided in this email (including any attachments) is evidently not destined for you, kindly inform us promptly and delete the message received in error (including any attachments) by erasing it from all your computers and other storage devices or media and destroying any hard copies thereof. Any unauthorized processing, forwarding, disclosure, distribution, divulgation, storage, printout or other use of this message or its attachment is prohibited. If your system is infected or otherwise bugged by any virus that is carried by this email, we disclaim any liability whatsoever for the ensuing loss or damage unless caused by our intention or gross negligence.

2017-09-28 20:40 GMT+02:00 Brutalent <brutalent AT email.com>:

Please open a votation if like ORK project. Thanks. 

Il 28/set/2017 16:44, "Brutalent" <brutalent AT email.com> ha scritto:

Replay: This is a WhitePaper link: http://docdro.id/A01DlMP

2017-09-28 16:41 GMT+02:00 Rouben <rouben AT rouben.net>:

Do you have a whitepaper (like Bitcoin’s bitcoin.pdf by Satoshi Nakamoto) that explains how ORK works? Or a website? I think a lot of people (myself included) would like to read about ORK in depth.

The closest thing I was able to find is this: https://ens.domains/ but I didn’t look very hard. :) Anyway, it seems like the Ethereum system is able to support arbitrary (custom) names via blockchain contracts, not just machine-generated ones... so this is already different from ORK.

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:21 Brutalent <brutalent AT email.com> wrote:

Thanks guys for comments. We want operate with ORK tld for high security, it's not a blockchain, is a "Operative Ring Key" for identificate a single domain as single ID. Who want register an ORK domain, the name of TLD is hardware random (based on algorythm). Example: efsdafdsa.ork

2017-09-28 3:01 GMT+02:00 Christopher <weblionx AT gmail.com>:

My main question is, let's say we all vote yes, what would happen
next? How do you plan on using the new TLD? How would one register
since it's a blockchain? Etc.

Side note, regarding what Ole said, you can (and I recommend) call a
vote for a longer period of time than a day. I would recommend at
least 5 days, if not 7. Rushing is generally frowned upon.

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Daniel Quintiliani <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:
> Bringing back the mailing list arguments proposing ending Namecoin peering. The "optional blacklist" proposal won out, let's leave it at that.
>
> --
>
> -Dan Q
>
>
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 18:19:42 -0600, Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net> wrote:
>
>> I'm curious what I said that was either confrontational or untrue?
>>
>>
>> On 09/27/2017 06:02 PM, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
>> > Oh don't start this again. We already gave you a blacklist.
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > -Dan Q
>> >
>> > On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 17:47:16 -0600, Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> They don't.  The operators aren't even willing to try.  This is the main
>> >> reason why it has been discussed several times whether opennic should
>> >> continue to peer with .bit -- because our server admins are being
>> >> affected by the abuse and the anonymity of blockchain domains prevent
>> >> any chance of holding a person accountable for intentional damages.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 09/27/2017 05:42 PM, Rouben wrote:
>> >>> I’m genuinely curious, how do .bit domains solve this issue? Aren’t
>> >>> they governed in a similar fashion through NameCoin?
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 19:36 Jeff Taylor <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net
>> >>> <mailto:shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>      You didn't answer how you intend to *prevent* scams and malware on
>> >>>      domains if nobody can contact the owners.
>> >>>
>> >>>      On 09/27/2017 04:41 PM, Brutalent wrote:
>> >>>>      Ok we want create a ORK Tld register. We host the server and
>> >>>>      project. Not want scam or malware, want use ORK Tld for id with
>> >>>>      redeable webpages.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>      Il 27/set/2017 23:53, "Jeff Taylor" <shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net
>> >>>>      <mailto:shdwdrgn AT sourpuss.net>> ha scritto:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>          How do you propose to prevent abuse similar to what we are
>> >>>>          currently seeing with .bit domains?  If you are trying to
>> >>>>          obfuscate the domain information, how will individuals be
>> >>>>          held responsible for damaging botnets or distributing
>> >>>>          malware?  If you cannot identify the owner of a domain, will
>> >>>>          YOU be taking personal responsibility for their content and
>> >>>>          any damages done?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>          You said you need OpenNIC support to regulate the ID
>> >>>>          addresses.  I assume these ID's will correspond to individual
>> >>>>          domains?  What role do you expect OpenNIC to play in
>> >>>>          regulating the addresses? OpenNIC will not host servers for
>> >>>>          you, nor will anyone write software for your project.
>> >>>>          OpenNIC provides DNS only, the rest is your own responsibility.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>          On 09/27/2017 02:46 PM, Brutalent wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>              Sorry, but not know voting system. This is OpenNIC. Why
>> >>>>              don't like ORK project? I'm serious and we don't want
>> >>>>              create a partnership. We make a simply TLD for support
>> >>>>              it. Thanks.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>          --------
>> >>>>          You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> >>>>          You may unsubscribe by emailing
>> >>>>          discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>> >>>>          <mailto:discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>      --------
>> >>>>      You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> >>>>      You may unsubscribe by emailingdiscuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>> >>>>      <mailto:discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org>
>> >>>
>> >>>      --------
>> >>>      You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> >>>      You may unsubscribe by emailing
>> >>>      discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>> >>>      <mailto:discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>>
>> >>> Rouben
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --------
>> >>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> >>> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>> >>
>> >> --------
>> >> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> >> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --------
>> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> > You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>
>>
>> --------
>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
>
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>

--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org

--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org

--

Rouben

--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org

--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org