Discuss mailing list

["Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com>]

+1. What's next, mandatory logging of all servers for the NSA?

Also, I will repeat my last message:

We can't force domains we peer with internationally to not host malware or 
comply with our definition of "legal" - this is the hosting provider's job.

--

-Dan Q


On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 01:24:25 +0100, Amunak <amunak AT amunak.net> wrote:

> I don't think we should make too many limiting rules. For one, if (when)
> OpenNIC grows it'll be impossible to realistically check domains for
> legality or even malware and such. And when we do it only when requested
> to take down the content, is it really fair? And who gets to decide if
> the rules are truly broken? I don't think T2 (or even T1) server owners
> should be pressured to do any blocking. If they want to do so, and
> disclose it then sure. Especially if it's to follow the laws of their
> respective countries or to protect OpenNIC infrastructure. But force
> them to do so? Not really. (Just a sidenote: I thought one goals of
> OpenNIC was openness, privacy and no censorship - if we don't uphold
> these values are we better than ICANN and why do we really exist?)
>