Discuss mailing list

[Jacob Bachmeyer <jcb62281 AT gmail.com>]

Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> While I can't say anything about the specifics of this, as I don't run any 
> TLDs, you might want to take into account the current volatile nature of 
> Github, by specifically stating that members can vote to move things to other 
> sites in the event of a problem. We shouldn't try and predict the finances 
> and (mis)management of Github, but instead change these proposals to 
> specifically state that members can vote to move hosting to other places.
>   

Git was designed for repositories to be widely mirrored, so I suggest 
replacing "GitHub" with "public Git hosting services" and keeping a list 
of multiple official OpenNIC Git mirrors.

Also, there should be a procedure for returning archived TLDs to active 
status if an operator steps forward.

-- Jacob