Discuss mailing list

["Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com>]

We had it for .free/.libre/.liber, and that was a legitmate vote.

--

-Dan Q


On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 01:06:35 +0100, Al Beano <albino AT autistici.org> wrote:

> I do not see anything to suggest that having more than one voting option 
> is allowed. We should clarify this.
> 
> Imo, proposals should pass by a simple majority, yes or no. No more 
> complicated votes should be allowed, because they could potentially be 
> set up to favour one side.
> 
> At the very least, all proposals should finally be ratified using a 
> yes/no vote.
> 
> Therefore, I vote (G) for this proposal.
> 
> albino
> 
> On 14/07/18 01:05, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> > Beginning: July 14, 2018, 00:00 UTC
> > Ending: July 21, 2018, 00:00 UTC
> >
> > Original discussion thread (note: the title does not reflect the 
> > proposal, as different ideas were proposed during discussion): 
> > https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2018-07/msg00024.html
> >
> > -----
> >
> > Previously failed proposals to create OpenNIC TLDs, and all identical 
> > duplicates of proposals which have failed to pass, shall not be 
> > introduced for another:
> >
> > (A) 12 months
> > (B) 9 months
> > (C) 6 months
> > (D) 3 months
> > (E) 1 month
> > (F) I vote against this change in policy.
> >
> > This proposal, if passed, shall take effect on September 1, 2018, at 
> > 00:00 UTC.
> >
> > -----
> >
> > My vote is for B (9 months).
> >
> > --
> >
> > -Dan Q
> >
> >
> >
> > --------
> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> > You may unsubscribe by emailing 
> > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> 
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org