Discuss mailing list

[Al Beano <albino AT autistici.org>]

I do not see anything to suggest that having more than one voting option 
is allowed. We should clarify this.

Imo, proposals should pass by a simple majority, yes or no. No more 
complicated votes should be allowed, because they could potentially be 
set up to favour one side.

At the very least, all proposals should finally be ratified using a 
yes/no vote.

Therefore, I vote (G) for this proposal.

albino

On 14/07/18 01:05, Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> Beginning: July 14, 2018, 00:00 UTC
> Ending: July 21, 2018, 00:00 UTC
>
> Original discussion thread (note: the title does not reflect the proposal, as 
> different ideas were proposed during discussion): 
> https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2018-07/msg00024.html
>
> -----
>
> Previously failed proposals to create OpenNIC TLDs, and all identical 
> duplicates of proposals which have failed to pass, shall not be introduced 
> for another:
>
> (A) 12 months
> (B) 9 months
> (C) 6 months
> (D) 3 months
> (E) 1 month
> (F) I vote against this change in policy.
>
> This proposal, if passed, shall take effect on September 1, 2018, at 00:00 
> UTC.
>
> -----
>
> My vote is for B (9 months).
>
> --
>
> -Dan Q
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org