Discuss mailing list

["Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com>]

I think so too. There was another person who didn't vote but mentioned they 
didn't think it was fair. So if every round consists of 8 "no changes" and 3 
rotating remaining other choices, the consistent "no changes" votes will 
still win in the end. But I do agree with some other users that this is a 
more fair way to have done the vote.

--

-Dan Q

On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 19:36:49 -0500, Jonah Aragon <jonah AT triplebit.net> wrote:

> For what it’s worth, it doesn’t look like instant-runoff voting would have 
> affected the results whatsoever, since “no” had over 50% of the *total* 
> votes. Unless perhaps some “no” voters only voted that way due to peer 
> pressure and truly wanted to vote for a less popular choice? Seems unlikely 
> though. 
> 
> Just saying, when you reintroduce this, don’t expect drastically different 
> results, based on this evidence. 
> 
> Jonah
> 
> > On Jul 20, 2018, at 7:12 PM, Daniel Quintiliani <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Vote results:
> > 
> > B (9 months):
> > 
> > Daniel Quintiliani
> > 
> > D (3 months):
> > 
> > Jacob Bachmeyer
> > Mikhail Elias
> > 
> > E (1 month):
> > 
> > Ole Juul (vvande)
> > Rouben
> > 
> > F (I vote against this change in policy.):
> > 
> > Jonah Aragon
> > Grant Baron
> > Christopher
> > Fusl
> > Jon Hebb
> > Megan Parat
> > Jack Ternan
> > 
> > No votes for A or C.
> > 
> > Protest/invalid:
> > 
> > Sebastian Makowiecki
> > Philipp Schafft
> > Al Beano
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > As no changes in policy have been made, per discussion on Discord and 
> > comments
> > on the mailing list, I will reintroduce the proposal with instant runoff 
> > voting.
> > Discussion thread to come.
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > -Dan Q
> > 
> > 
> >> On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 20:05:47 -0400 (EDT), "Daniel Quintiliani" 
> >> <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:
> >> 
> >> Beginning: July 14, 2018, 00:00 UTC
> >> Ending: July 21, 2018, 00:00 UTC
> >> 
> >> Original discussion thread (note: the title does not reflect the 
> >> proposal, as different ideas were proposed during discussion): 
> >> https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2018-07/msg00024.html
> >> 
> >> -----
> >> 
> >> Previously failed proposals to create OpenNIC TLDs, and all identical 
> >> duplicates of proposals which have failed to pass, shall not be 
> >> introduced for another:
> >> 
> >> (A) 12 months
> >> (B) 9 months
> >> (C) 6 months
> >> (D) 3 months
> >> (E) 1 month
> >> (F) I vote against this change in policy.
> >> 
> >> This proposal, if passed, shall take effect on September 1, 2018, at 
> >> 00:00 UTC.
> >> 
> >> -----
> >> 
> >> My vote is for B (9 months).
> >> 
> >> --
> >> 
> >> -Dan Q
> >> 
> >> 
> >> --------
> >> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> >> You may unsubscribe by emailing 
> >> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --------
> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> > You may unsubscribe by emailing 
> > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> 
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list. 
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org