Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] [PROPOSAL] Invalidate previous vote; eliminate other forms of voting

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] [PROPOSAL] Invalidate previous vote; eliminate other forms of voting


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com>
  • To: "discuss" <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [PROPOSAL] Invalidate previous vote; eliminate other forms of voting
  • Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:18:57 -0400 (EDT)

Then perhaps you shouldn't refer to yourself as "OpenNIC Core Team" in emails.

https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2018-07/msg00172.html

--

-Dan Q


On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 23:17:13 -0500, Jonah Aragon <jonah AT opennic.org> wrote:

> Note that nobody here is using this phrase. That being said, there most
> certainly is [although I would make no claim to be a part of it at this
> current moment]. It’s even in the original OpenNIC charter and policies.
>
> Jonah
>
> > On Jul 30, 2018, at 11:10 PM, Daniel Quintiliani <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:
> >
> > Moreover, there is no such thing as an "OpenNIC Core Team" - this is the
> > first time anyone has used this phrase.
> >
> > --
> >
> > -Dan Q
> >
> > On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:08:07 -0400 (EDT), "Daniel Quintiliani"
> > <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Bullshit. The exact language of the proposal is given here:
> >>
> >> https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2018-07/msg00126.html
> >>
> >> I am sick and tired of you thinking who the fuck you are. You have no
> >> more authority than the rest of us. If you wish to go ahead with your
> >> proposal, you must follow the 7-day rule which you yourself wrote and we
> >> approved.
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> -Dan Q
> >>
> >> On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 23:05:03 -0500, Jonah Aragon, OpenNIC Core Team
> >> <jonah AT opennic.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I would like to invalidate the results of Daniel Q’s previous vote,
> >>> which was counted in a manner inconsistent with normal “instant runoff
> >>> voting” procedure. As he won’t permit a sane recount by other community
> >>> members including myself, the vote and all future related votes being
> >>> conducted with the same voting procedure should be considered
> >>> misleading and invalid.
> >>>
> >>> Furthermore, I’d like to mandate that all votes in the future should be
> >>> a simple “Aye/Yes” vs “Nay/No” style of voting, to avoid any such
> >>> confusion again.
> >>>
> >>> This proposal will be voted on as soon as legally permissible.
> >>>
> >>> Jonah
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --------
> >>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> >>> You may unsubscribe by emailing
> >>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> >>
> >>
> >> --------
> >> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> >> You may unsubscribe by emailing
> >> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --------
> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> > You may unsubscribe by emailing
> > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page