Discuss mailing list

[Jonah Aragon <jonah AT opennic.org>]

Yes you’re correct. I didn’t realize those settings were set like that on my 
phone, since they’re fixed to just my name on my laptop. Katie (Fusl) set 
that (including the core team string) as my name on the email server, but 
that will be resolved.

Jonah

> On Jul 30, 2018, at 11:18 PM, Daniel Quintiliani <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:
> 
> Then perhaps you shouldn't refer to yourself as "OpenNIC Core Team" in 
> emails.
> 
> https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2018-07/msg00172.html
> 
> --
> 
> -Dan Q
> 
> 
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 23:17:13 -0500, Jonah Aragon <jonah AT opennic.org> wrote:
> 
>> Note that nobody here is using this phrase. That being said, there most 
>> certainly is [although I would make no claim to be a part of it at this 
>> current moment]. It’s even in the original OpenNIC charter and policies.
>> 
>> Jonah
>> 
>>> On Jul 30, 2018, at 11:10 PM, Daniel Quintiliani <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Moreover, there is no such thing as an "OpenNIC Core Team" - this is the 
>>> first time anyone has used this phrase.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> -Dan Q
>>> 
>>> On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:08:07 -0400 (EDT), "Daniel Quintiliani" 
>>> <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Bullshit. The exact language of the proposal is given here:
>>>> 
>>>> https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2018-07/msg00126.html
>>>> 
>>>> I am sick and tired of you thinking who the fuck you are. You have no 
>>>> more authority than the rest of us. If you wish to go ahead with your 
>>>> proposal, you must follow the 7-day rule which you yourself wrote and we 
>>>> approved.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> 
>>>> -Dan Q
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 23:05:03 -0500, Jonah Aragon, OpenNIC Core Team 
>>>> <jonah AT opennic.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I would like to invalidate the results of Daniel Q’s previous vote, 
>>>>> which was counted in a manner inconsistent with normal “instant runoff 
>>>>> voting” procedure. As he won’t permit a sane recount by other community 
>>>>> members including myself, the vote and all future related votes being 
>>>>> conducted with the same voting procedure should be considered 
>>>>> misleading and invalid.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Furthermore, I’d like to mandate that all votes in the future should be 
>>>>> a simple “Aye/Yes” vs “Nay/No” style of voting, to avoid any such 
>>>>> confusion again.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This proposal will be voted on as soon as legally permissible.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jonah
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --------
>>>>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>>>>> You may unsubscribe by emailing 
>>>>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --------
>>>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>>>> You may unsubscribe by emailing 
>>>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --------
>>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>>> You may unsubscribe by emailing 
>>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP