Discuss mailing list

["Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com>]

Additionally, "misleading" is a personal attack and a slanderous accusation 
of deceitfulness on my part. OpenNIC should not be proposing votes with 
language designed to slander specific members.

I set the second round to begin in two days so the vote must go on, and again 
the only reason I did is was because of the complaints of other people.

Also, you must specifically name the proposal(s) to repeal.

--

-Dan Q


On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 23:32:52 -0500, Jonah Aragon <jonah AT opennic.org> wrote:

> It’s fixed now, thanks. Although debatably it isn’t far from reality, and 
> the core team without a doubt exists.
> 
> Jonah
> 
> > On Jul 30, 2018, at 11:27 PM, Daniel Quintiliani <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:
> > 
> > I have no objection to you acting in accordance with policies. Personally 
> > the only reason I did this was because *other* people were complaining, 
> > and I thought I'd take advantage of it due to my vote on the original. 
> > But "Jonah Aragon, OpenNIC Core Team" is trolling at best and deceitful 
> > at worst.
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > -Dan Q
> > 
> > On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 23:15:41 -0500, Jonah Aragon <jonah AT opennic.org> 
> > wrote:
> > 
> >> Obviously this proposal will proceed in accordance with existing 
> >> policies.
> >> 
> >> Jonah
> >> 
> >>> On Jul 30, 2018, at 11:08 PM, Daniel Quintiliani <danq AT runbox.com> 
> >>> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> Bullshit. The exact language of the proposal is given here:
> >>> 
> >>> https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2018-07/msg00126.html
> >>> 
> >>> I am sick and tired of you thinking who the fuck you are. You have no 
> >>> more authority than the rest of us. If you wish to go ahead with your 
> >>> proposal, you must follow the 7-day rule which you yourself wrote and 
> >>> we approved.
> >>> 
> >>> --
> >>> 
> >>> -Dan Q
> >>> 
> >>> On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 23:05:03 -0500, Jonah Aragon, OpenNIC Core Team 
> >>> <jonah AT opennic.org> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>> 
> >>>> I would like to invalidate the results of Daniel Q’s previous vote, 
> >>>> which was counted in a manner inconsistent with normal “instant runoff 
> >>>> voting” procedure. As he won’t permit a sane recount by other 
> >>>> community members including myself, the vote and all future related 
> >>>> votes being conducted with the same voting procedure should be 
> >>>> considered misleading and invalid.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Furthermore, I’d like to mandate that all votes in the future should 
> >>>> be a simple “Aye/Yes” vs “Nay/No” style of voting, to avoid any such 
> >>>> confusion again.
> >>>> 
> >>>> This proposal will be voted on as soon as legally permissible.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Jonah
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> --------
> >>>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> >>>> You may unsubscribe by emailing 
> >>>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> --------
> >>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> >>> You may unsubscribe by emailing 
> >>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --------
> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> > You may unsubscribe by emailing 
> > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org