discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: "Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com>
- To: "discuss" <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS] Reintroduction of past proposals, IR, R1
- Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:01:46 -0400 (EDT)
Without getting into the vote counting issues again, if it will stop Jonah
from his dunce cap troll proposal, or encourage him to write something
professional which does not personally attack me, accuse me of engaging in
unethical and fraudulent activity, and mention me by name, I'd be happy to do
a yea/nay. The only reason I did a second proposal was because *other* people
thought it was unfair. This is exactly what I was trying to stop. This
proposal is really not worth it to me, and had I known it would cause all
this trouble, I would have told one of the unhappy people to write it
themselves.
--
-Dan Q
On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 21:33:06 -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer <jcb62281 AT gmail.com>
wrote:
> While my vote was counted as intended, I also now know that whatever
> procedure is being used here is *not* what I understood to be IRV.
>
> Daniel Quintiliani wrote:
> > https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2018-07/msg00135.html
> >
> > The votes during the first round are:
> >
> > Daniel Quintiliani: B, C, A, D, E
> > Jonah Aragon: H, I, G
> > Jacob Bachmeyer: F, G, H, E, D, I
> > Niles Rogoff: D, F, G, H, A
> > Megan Parat: I, H, G, F, E, D, C, B, A
> > Christopher: H, I, G
> > Amunak: H, G, I
> > vv: I, H
> > Sebastian Makowiecki: E, F, G
> > Katie Holly (Fusl): I
> > Jack Ternan: I
> >
>
> IRV tally of the above votes as I understand IRV:
> <URL:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant_run-off_voting>
>
> round 1: (considering first preferences)
> B - 1
> D - 1
> E - 1
> F - 1
> H - 3
> I - 4
> 11 voters; no option has a majority; eliminate A, C, G for getting no
> votes; eliminate last place which is tied between B, D, E, F
>
> round 2: (instant run-off; only H, I remain)
> DQ: null
> JA: H
> JB: H
> NR: H
> MP: I
> C: H
> A: H
> VV: I
> SM: null
> KH: I
> JT: I
> totals: H - 5 / I - 4 / null - 2
> 11 voters, two exhausted ballots, 9 votes counted
>
> The result would be option H by a 5 - 4 majority.
>
> I move for a follow-up Aye/Nay ratification vote for this result if this
> is to be taken as the outcome.
>
>
> -- Jacob
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS] Reintroduction of past proposals, IR, R1, Jacob Bachmeyer, 08/01/2018
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS] Reintroduction of past proposals, IR, R1, Daniel Quintiliani, 08/01/2018
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS] Reintroduction of past proposals, IR, R1, Philipp Schafft, 08/01/2018
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS] Reintroduction of past proposals, IR, R1, Daniel Quintiliani, 08/01/2018
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS] Reintroduction of past proposals, IR, R1, Daniel Quintiliani, 08/01/2018
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS] Reintroduction of past proposals, IR, R1, Jacob Bachmeyer, 08/03/2018
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS] Reintroduction of past proposals, IR, R1, Daniel Quintiliani, 08/01/2018
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS] Reintroduction of past proposals, IR, R1, Philipp Schafft, 08/01/2018
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS] Reintroduction of past proposals, IR, R1, Jonah Aragon, 08/01/2018
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS] Reintroduction of past proposals, IR, R1, Jacob Bachmeyer, 08/03/2018
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS] Reintroduction of past proposals, IR, R1, Daniel Quintiliani, 08/03/2018
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS] Reintroduction of past proposals, IR, R1, Jacob Bachmeyer, 08/03/2018
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS] Reintroduction of past proposals, IR, R1, Sebastian Makowiecki, 08/01/2018
- Re: [opennic-discuss] [RESULTS] Reintroduction of past proposals, IR, R1, Daniel Quintiliani, 08/01/2018
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.