Discuss mailing list

["Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com>]

Jonah and I have proposed this more polite way to overturn the two proposals 
and force yea/nay on future votes:

https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2018-08/msg00010.html
https://lists.opennicproject.org/sympa/arc/discuss/2018-08/msg00012.html

Not sure when Jonah will introduce it, but it must be the 7th at least.

I will also be revising the "No troll/attack votes" as "Opinions and 
allegations in proposals" with two adjustments and examples given in a new 
discussion thread.

--

-Dan Q

On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 20:30:38 -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer <jcb62281 AT gmail.com> 
wrote:

> 
> > After seeing these proposals in action lately I’m convinced all votes 
> > going forward should be exclusively yay/nay votes.
> I disagree here.  IRV and other models can be very useful for reducing 
> an "adjustable" proposal to a simple "make this change"/"keep status 
> quo" option, as occurred in this case.
>