Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] [PROPOSAL] Invalidate previous vote; eliminate other forms of voting

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] [PROPOSAL] Invalidate previous vote; eliminate other forms of voting


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Daniel Quintiliani" <danq AT runbox.com>
  • To: "discuss" <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] [PROPOSAL] Invalidate previous vote; eliminate other forms of voting
  • Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 15:29:54 -0400 (EDT)

Per our discussion in this and other threads about proposals vs. personal
attacks and allegations of fraud, I would like to propose the following
alternative which does not mention my name or include such allegations and
attacks:

Subject: [VOTE] Invalidate previous vote; eliminate other forms of voting

1. The proposal entitled "Reintroduction of past proposals", including all
associated votes, (re)counts, and results, is declared null and void.
2. The proposal entitled "Reintroduction of past proposals, IR, R1",
including all associated votes, (re)counts, and results, is declared null and
void.
3. The method in which the votes for the above proposals were counted are
hereby declared invalid for the above two proposals and shall not be used for
future proposals.
4. All votes in the future should be a simple “Aye/Yes” vs “Nay/No” style of
voting.

This vote shall be done in "Aye/Yes" and "Nay/No" style.

These rules shall take effect two days after the votes have been counted and
the results have been published to the mailing list.

^^ I think it takes care of the actual procedural end of things without
accusations or personal attacks against myself. Jonah, will you accept this
for the vote, or do you have changes to suggest?

--

-Dan Q


On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 23:05:03 -0500, Jonah Aragon, OpenNIC Core Team
<jonah AT opennic.org> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I would like to invalidate the results of Daniel Q’s previous vote, which
> was counted in a manner inconsistent with normal “instant runoff voting”
> procedure. As he won’t permit a sane recount by other community members
> including myself, the vote and all future related votes being conducted
> with the same voting procedure should be considered misleading and invalid.
>
> Furthermore, I’d like to mandate that all votes in the future should be a
> simple “Aye/Yes” vs “Nay/No” style of voting, to avoid any such confusion
> again.
>
> This proposal will be voted on as soon as legally permissible.
>
> Jonah
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page