Discuss mailing list

[Jonah Aragon <jonah AT opennic.org>]

If this is what it takes for everybody to be happy and I can stop thinking 
about these proposals, I’d be happy to adopt your changes here.

Jonah

> On Aug 1, 2018, at 2:29 PM, Daniel Quintiliani <danq AT runbox.com> wrote:
> 
> Per our discussion in this and other threads about proposals vs. personal 
> attacks and allegations of fraud, I would like to propose the following 
> alternative which does not mention my name or include such allegations and 
> attacks:
> 
> Subject: [VOTE] Invalidate previous vote; eliminate other forms of voting
> 
> 1. The proposal entitled "Reintroduction of past proposals", including all 
> associated votes, (re)counts, and results, is declared null and void.
> 2. The proposal entitled "Reintroduction of past proposals, IR, R1", 
> including all associated votes, (re)counts, and results, is declared null 
> and void.
> 3. The method in which the votes for the above proposals were counted are 
> hereby declared invalid for the above two proposals and shall not be used 
> for future proposals.
> 4. All votes in the future should be a simple “Aye/Yes” vs “Nay/No” style 
> of voting.
> 
> This vote shall be done in "Aye/Yes" and "Nay/No" style.
> 
> These rules shall take effect two days after the votes have been counted 
> and the results have been published to the mailing list.
> 
> ^^ I think it takes care of the actual procedural end of things without 
> accusations or personal attacks against myself. Jonah, will you accept this 
> for the vote, or do you have changes to suggest?
> 
> --
> 
> -Dan Q
> 
> 
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 23:05:03 -0500, Jonah Aragon, OpenNIC Core Team 
> <jonah AT opennic.org> wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I would like to invalidate the results of Daniel Q’s previous vote, which 
>> was counted in a manner inconsistent with normal “instant runoff voting” 
>> procedure. As he won’t permit a sane recount by other community members 
>> including myself, the vote and all future related votes being conducted 
>> with the same voting procedure should be considered misleading and invalid.
>> 
>> Furthermore, I’d like to mandate that all votes in the future should be a 
>> simple “Aye/Yes” vs “Nay/No” style of voting, to avoid any such confusion 
>> again.
>> 
>> This proposal will be voted on as soon as legally permissible.
>> 
>> Jonah
>> 
>> 
>> --------
>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>> You may unsubscribe by emailing 
>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP