Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] New T2 Server Config

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] New T2 Server Config


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Jamyn Shanley <jshanley AT gmail.com>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] New T2 Server Config
  • Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 23:46:55 -0600
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=N1Acp7U64lBKvzAJvyPeoAPsCtGzmmIqVGMW1wIP5bfKUqHDVxP+oz90eb5AkWPgw4 wXo6gM+3dPIC/ckHYZRE86jK1xb/RBp/Ypj/5FmzasDkVE09f3TsqBaV/yPj2Yg6/aBS Pke4c5402wymWN4LI9vdsu768ZWUDmxcutF8c=
  • List-archive: <http://lists.darkdna.net/pipermail/discuss>
  • List-id: <discuss.lists.opennicproject.org>

Ah, nevermind. I think you meant to say 'unbound is
non-authoritative.' ... right. So if we really are going to be
required to do this as a T2, we'll probably have to look at other
options (NSD, etc) unfortunately.

On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Jamyn Shanley <jshanley AT gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure that's entirely accurate. From the first line on their
> site (unbound.net):
>
> "Unbound is a validating, recursive, and caching DNS resolver."
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Julian DeMarchi
> <julian AT jdcomputers.com.au> wrote:
>> On 01/04/2011 02:45 AM, Günter Grodotzki wrote:
>>> how can this be done with unbound - which is a non-authoritative
>>> recurser only (e.g. does not support axfr).
>>
>> Un-bound is authoritative only, so can't be done. My un-bound server is
>> in the same boat.
>>
>> We'll have to think about this a bit more me thinks.
>>
>> --julian
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> discuss mailing list
>> discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
>> http://lists.darkdna.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page