Discuss mailing list

[Günter Grodotzki <guenter AT grodotzki.ph>]

Hmm but why these changes at all? Do T1 get too much traffic? If so, I 
could think about hosting a T1.

I just read unbound does support static zones/records: 
http://www.unbound.net/documentation/unbound.conf.html

But I feel uncomfortable putting T2 Servers in there which change 
frequently.

On 1/4/11 7:46 AM, Julian DeMarchi wrote:
> On 01/04/2011 03:46 PM, Jamyn Shanley wrote:
> > Ah, nevermind. I think you meant to say 'unbound is
> > non-authoritative.' ... right. So if we really are going to be
> > required to do this as a T2, we'll probably have to look at other
> > options (NSD, etc) unfortunately.
>
> Thats right. Sorry!
>
> We can't go limiting the DNS software used. We need to think of another
> way to present the dns zone so the T2 address's can be grabbed without
> drama.
>
> I propose that the DNS zone be setup with all the T1's as NS servers and
> leave all the T2s as A records of the domain dns.opennic.glue.
>
> Hopefully this will keep all happy?
>
> --julian
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
> http://lists.darkdna.net/mailman/listinfo/discuss