discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

[opennic-discuss] dns.openic.glue zone WAS New T2 Server Config

From: Julian DeMarchi <julian AT jdcomputers.com.au>
To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: [opennic-discuss] dns.openic.glue zone WAS New T2 Server Config
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:46:17 +1000
List-archive: <http://lists.darkdna.net/pipermail/discuss>
List-id: <discuss.lists.opennicproject.org>

On 01/04/2011 03:46 PM, Jamyn Shanley wrote:
> Ah, nevermind. I think you meant to say 'unbound is
> non-authoritative.' ... right. So if we really are going to be
> required to do this as a T2, we'll probably have to look at other
> options (NSD, etc) unfortunately.

Thats right. Sorry!

We can't go limiting the DNS software used. We need to think of another
way to present the dns zone so the T2 address's can be grabbed without
drama.

I propose that the DNS zone be setup with all the T1's as NS servers and
leave all the T2s as A records of the domain dns.opennic.glue.

Hopefully this will keep all happy?

--julian

Re: [opennic-discuss] New T2 Server Config, Günter Grodotzki, 01/03/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] New T2 Server Config, Jeff Taylor, 01/03/2011
  - Re: [opennic-discuss] New T2 Server Config, Günter Grodotzki, 01/04/2011
- Re: [opennic-discuss] New T2 Server Config, Julian DeMarchi, 01/03/2011
  - Re: [opennic-discuss] New T2 Server Config, Jamyn Shanley, 01/04/2011
    - Re: [opennic-discuss] New T2 Server Config, Jamyn Shanley, 01/04/2011
      - [opennic-discuss] dns.openic.glue zone WAS New T2 Server Config, Julian DeMarchi, 01/04/2011
        
        Re: [opennic-discuss] dns.openic.glue zone WAS New T2 Server Config, Günter Grodotzki, 01/04/2011
      - Re: [opennic-discuss] New T2 Server Config, Günter Grodotzki, 01/04/2011