Discuss mailing list

[mike <mike AT pikeaero.com>]

Sorry, I should have been more specific, I mean they are seizing without
*legal* warrants. The Constitution, on which the Constitutional Republic of
The United States of America is based in law, clearly states what
constitutes a warrant, I think if you look closely these so called
"warrants" do not hold water. That is, if you agree that the U.S.
Constitution, has yet to be over-turned (not that there are not a heck of a
lot of forces attempting to do that), and still holds as the supreme law of
the land. I can write right now "Warrant" on a piece of paper and pay
somebody who swears to be a judge to sign it, and then I can go and seize
property based on that, but does that make it legal? Same thing.

On 02/18/2011 08:28 PM, mike wrote:
> The trouble I see with it is that they are doing it without charges and
without warrants....very not good.

Actually they are obtaining warrants.


"As with previous seizures, ICE convinced a District Court judge to sign
a seizure warrant, and then contacted the domain registries to point the
domains in question to a server that hosts the warning message."