Discuss mailing list

[Larry Brower <larry AT maxqe.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 02/18/2011 10:20 PM, mike wrote:
> Sorry, I should have been more specific, I mean they are seizing without
> *legal* warrants. The Constitution, on which the Constitutional Republic of
> The United States of America is based in law, clearly states what
> constitutes a warrant, I think if you look closely these so called
> "warrants" do not hold water. That is, if you agree that the U.S.
> Constitution, has yet to be over-turned (not that there are not a heck of a
> lot of forces attempting to do that), and still holds as the supreme law of
> the land. I can write right now "Warrant" on a piece of paper and pay
> somebody who swears to be a judge to sign it, and then I can go and seize
> property based on that, but does that make it legal? Same thing.
> 


I see what you are saying now. Since we haven't seen the warrant's we
can't really say if it is valid nor are we qualified to do so (Unless
you are an attorney ?). In either event a warrant drawn up by .gov and
signed by a siting judge is normally enforceable meaning they can seize
the domain. Once the organizations attorney(s) become involved the story
may change but until then the registrar has no choice but to comply.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJNX0fpAAoJEBgaXYoZ++87IogIALgjwJomscrnhhwQvy0B2lvD
OR5RSLToRz+9865Uhxbqc9PdNnGi5LlBekpv5dGy/rT6Yft5Up1NPwyiDYFWaVCt
FbOZEx0eWOOjgLgjOCQ2IhqtHQ7Uy3SrxiT6593gXAbmM2MaLNkDttyDdoxPY3MB
CdT5MV5FkunaYBq42xWVEElg4PZo+lFA+nLtSQ4RMIlfLqS5IXr4nnXaCRgq2WD2
2wsu7JAOYW/Z8Py/Z/rGIgRBgSgvzTlFyXSk5SFFftwn1QZM0jXZSr0ja6wC2KrN
pGuF7hC0TVO/tOL/RQjNYVfwNeWM13iWGOo/vRTCHnpGaj9v0zpH2E5d0UA9lRg=
=uokP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----