Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] U.S. Government Shuts Down 84,000 Websites, ‘By Mistake’

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] U.S. Government Shuts Down 84,000 Websites, ‘By Mistake’


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Larry Brower <larry AT maxqe.com>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] U.S. Government Shuts Down 84,000 Websites, ‘By Mistake’
  • Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:52:40 -0600
  • List-archive: <http://lists.darkdna.net/pipermail/discuss>
  • List-id: <discuss.lists.opennicproject.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 02/17/2011 11:56 AM, Jon Hebb wrote:

>> As with previous seizures, ICE convinced a District Court judge to sign a
>> seizure warrant, and then contacted the domain registries to point the
>> domains in question to a server that hosts the warning message. However,
>> somewhere in this process a mistake was made and as a result the domain of
>> a
>> large DNS service provider was seized.
>>
>> The domain in question is mooo.com, which belongs to the DNS provider
>> FreeDNS. It is the most popular shared domain at afraid.org and as a result
>> of the authorities’ actions a massive 84,000 subdomains were wrongfully
>> seized as well. All sites were redirected to the banner below.
>>


This seems to be a play on words making it sound like they seized a DNS
provider which does not appear to be the case. It says 84K *subdomains*
meaning they did in fact only seize *ONE* domain, mooo.com. While I by
no means support ICE seizing domains, in this instance if just one of
those subdomains was compromised and hosting the content then honestly
IMO they were justified in it. It isnt like they seized a domain because
of copyright infringement, it was kiddie porn and the only real way to
ensure that the subdomain isnt pointed to another server in the event it
was done by the actual owner would be to disable the domain. In this
event it seems no different than godaddy or enom disabling a domain for
a violation of their TOS/AUP. There is a difference between this being
84K DOMAINS and it being 84K SUBDOMAINS so I don't see the need for all
the FUD about this.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJNXxRYAAoJEBgaXYoZ++87S0oH/0Aey/4EQm+ww2PrJXrUiFe9
ioWK3UHf17fXGGTNd97dM03hCmovWV0sicl8CW0cz/VqLXRpCSx1JogdU+R17ldB
N9KFvAruOakck4SOZBD+FRqhzmpK10RK7n0ynXYtjW+d4r5s/DVUkmDA3zeU7J2R
wEPzgT2tr3v0PzZRQ29k6u26ByjoyPvUCYZscfzk32i1aufksIigTxb5v1Zsg5Vc
rNBoe8Lhfq9g96A2e9T9UzWKsNIMlLQMlimueSI5W/VN1U3/hlYpXbjxr7Uoo4ly
RhmH9j0hmXSRcXOVrv5LodGXG5lMPGW0cnPzAF7D/QAL4Stf8CHtzosHcbKcQAM=
=DgQK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page