Discuss mailing list

[Mike <mike AT pikeaero.com>]

I would think so. I would think that if the root servers go down, or
other events to bring down the `net, then you can be pretty certain that
it's a staged event.

The establishment really needs to get control of the 'net to get their
wide spread censorship program in place. The evidence to support this is
the continued hard pushing for legislation to do this in virtually all
countries, and in the global governance bodies.

The controlled opposition/false flag attack technique has been used for
thousands of years, and has been repeated thousands of times, and to
this day, works almost every time, in almost every case, the majority
swallow the story, hook line and sinker.

--Mike

On 02/16/2012 06:14 AM, Peter Green wrote:
> If Anonymous has been/is being hijacked by the establishment, then wouldn't 
> it follow that 31/03/2012 will see the root servers go down and/or 
> something else that would help Op' Global Blackout succeeded?
> 
> Peter
> 
> Wanged from my Kaiser by a mischievous pixie!
> 
> Mike <mike AT pikeaero.com> wrote:
> 
>> I think I'd think twice about hitching our wagon to Anonymous. I think
>> we should milk the situation for all it's worth. But I, for one, would
>> strongly urge against getting actually associated with Anonymous.
>>
>> It is very easy to imagine that Anonymous is controlled opposition (i.e.
>> it has been set up as a controlled bogey man) to 'menace' the Internet
>> while appealing to the knee jerk reaction to stick it to the man. So
>> after these attacks, the establishment can say 'look at what happened
>> here, we need more control over the Internet so this does not happen
>> again'. In other words, I think Anonymous is being used by the
>> establishment to set up these 'false flag' attacks so people start
>> begging for the governments to take more control over the Internet.
>>
>> If what I've just outlined is true or not, the result will be the same,
>> the establishment will use it as an excuse to crack down even harder.
>>
>> I don't think what Anonymous is doing is a very good idea, and I really
>> don't want to have anything to do with it, or be associated with it in
>> any way.
>>
>> --Mike
>>
>> On 02/15/2012 09:16 PM, Julian DeMarchi wrote:
>>>
>>> How do you make contact with Anonymous? They'd appeal to our cause...
>>>
>>> --julian
>>