Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] Threat

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] Threat


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Niels Dettenbach (Syndicat IT&Internet)" <nd AT syndicat.com>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Threat
  • Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:41:47 +0100

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256



Mike <mike AT pikeaero.com> schrieb:

>I would think so. I would think that if the root servers go down, or
>other events to bring down the `net,

This will not be happen for many different reasons...


>The establishment really needs to get control of the 'net to get their
>wide spread censorship program in place.

This may be really true and there are many different tries on different
levels by different parties to reach that goal, and they can reach this only
with the help of the internet users community, but this is a completely other
story...


>>> It is very easy to imagine that Anonymous is controlled opposition

No, because it can't be easy to imagine that Anonymous is "controlled" by
anyone. It is just a synonymous everybode can hitchike on if it makes sense
to him - this is the major lack or problem of concept behind the whole
Anonymous idea. It is like a IP Al Quaeda for (more or less) "political
corrects"...


cheerioh,


Niels.
- --
Niels Dettenbach
Syndicat IT&Internet
http://www.syndicat.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: APG v1.0.8

iIEEAREIAEEFAk89Mco6HE5pZWxzIERldHRlbmJhY2ggKFN5bmRpY2F0IElUJklu
dGVybmV0KSA8bmRAc3luZGljYXQuY29tPgAKCRBU3ERlZRyiDZ8NAJ9JUnvivb4c
jSmm1fbkJfXakxAKJQCdFmSqhMicHgpGV42/Zqq2ChQ2MzY=
=R6qL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page