Discuss mailing list

[Travis McCrea <me AT travismccrea.com>]

So the question now is: Do we proceed with this as a peering agreement? A new 
T1? or?
On 2012-04-19, at 9:32 AM, Amrit Panesar wrote:

> I'm in support of slaving the OpenNIC Zones.
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On Apr 19, 2012, at 3:59, <webmaster AT blockaid.me> wrote:
> 
>> Hello all!
>> 
>> I represent a small, free DNS service, called BlockAid.
>> 
>> We believe in an open internet, and our aim is to provide censorship free 
>> DNS
>> to anyone who wants it. We began in response to the seizure of domains by 
>> the
>> US government through their puppets, ICANN and Verisign. In our attempts to
>> rectify these problems, we have gone further than most and over the past 
>> year
>> have handed back control of seized domains to their original owners. At the
>> beginning of 2012 we also updated our system so we can technically detect
>> which domains have been seized and respond appropriately.
>> 
>> Our interest in OpenNic was sparked a long time ago when there were the
>> rumours of a new p2p TLD being created. It appears to me that progress on 
>> that
>> front has somewhat stalled, which is a shame. However, our interest in 
>> OpenNic
>> has remained nonetheless.
>> 
>> My main reason for emailing the list is to enquire about the possibility of
>> our servers slaving the OpenNic TLD's. Is this allowed (I have looked 
>> through
>> the wiki and can't find a reason it wouldn't be) and if so, how would we go
>> about implementing it?
>> 
>> Should you want to check us out, our website is http://www.blockaid.me. I
>> would also be happy to answer any questions people have.
>> 
>> If this is the wrong place to bring this up, I apologise. I was informed 
>> this
>> would be the most suitable place to raise this type of question.
>> 
>> Regards
>> 
>> BlockAid
>>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail