Discuss mailing list

[Alex Hanselka <alex AT opennicproject.org>]

Apologies for not researching further.  A peering agreement does sound like a 
good idea then.  
However, Unless they use some TLD method, we would not be able to access the 
rescued sites just 
with a peering agreement. 

Also, isn't .bit a collider TLD with dot-bit's .bit? Or are they also slaving 
.bit?


On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:17:08AM -0700, Amrit Panesar wrote:
> I was going to mention that earlier. It looks like BlockAid has a few tlds 
> of their own .vpn and .bit as far as I saw.
> 
> A peering agreement would be a good idea from my standpoint
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Apr 19, 2012, at 11:09 AM, Travis McCrea <me AT travismccrea.com> wrote:
> 
> > Well I would like both sides to benefit from this, and we peer their list 
> > too - I want me some uncensored internet. :)
> > On 2012-04-19, at 10:38 AM, Travis McCrea wrote:
> > 
> >> So the question now is: Do we proceed with this as a peering agreement? 
> >> A new T1? or?
> >> On 2012-04-19, at 9:32 AM, Amrit Panesar wrote:
> >> 
> >>> I'm in support of slaving the OpenNIC Zones.
> >>> 
> >>> Sent from my iPad
> >>> 
> >>> On Apr 19, 2012, at 3:59, <webmaster AT blockaid.me> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> Hello all!
> >>>> 
> >>>> I represent a small, free DNS service, called BlockAid.
> >>>> 
> >>>> We believe in an open internet, and our aim is to provide censorship 
> >>>> free DNS
> >>>> to anyone who wants it. We began in response to the seizure of domains 
> >>>> by the
> >>>> US government through their puppets, ICANN and Verisign. In our 
> >>>> attempts to
> >>>> rectify these problems, we have gone further than most and over the 
> >>>> past year
> >>>> have handed back control of seized domains to their original owners. 
> >>>> At the
> >>>> beginning of 2012 we also updated our system so we can technically 
> >>>> detect
> >>>> which domains have been seized and respond appropriately.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Our interest in OpenNic was sparked a long time ago when there were the
> >>>> rumours of a new p2p TLD being created. It appears to me that progress 
> >>>> on that
> >>>> front has somewhat stalled, which is a shame. However, our interest in 
> >>>> OpenNic
> >>>> has remained nonetheless.
> >>>> 
> >>>> My main reason for emailing the list is to enquire about the 
> >>>> possibility of
> >>>> our servers slaving the OpenNic TLD's. Is this allowed (I have looked 
> >>>> through
> >>>> the wiki and can't find a reason it wouldn't be) and if so, how would 
> >>>> we go
> >>>> about implementing it?
> >>>> 
> >>>> Should you want to check us out, our website is 
> >>>> http://www.blockaid.me. I
> >>>> would also be happy to answer any questions people have.
> >>>> 
> >>>> If this is the wrong place to bring this up, I apologise. I was 
> >>>> informed this
> >>>> would be the most suitable place to raise this type of question.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Regards
> >>>> 
> >>>> BlockAid
> >>>> 
> >> 
> >

Attachment: pgpgU3uXp6i2b.pgp
Description: PGP signature