Discuss mailing list

[Mike <mike AT ohlulz.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
Possibly due to the PGP key being signed with the email <alex AT hanselka.name> but you responding with your opennic email?

On 6/11/2012 11:26 PM, Alex Hanselka wrote:
> Why is it a bad signature though? Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't... Any ideas from the collective awesome?
>
>
> On Jun 11, 2012, at 10:22 PM, Amrit Panesar wrote:
>
>> Alex:
>> GPG Verification failed on this message,
>> see here: http://i.imgur.com/EQopH.png
>>
>> On 6/11/2012 6:03 PM, Alex Hanselka wrote:
>> > http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/15915/is-there-any-disadvantage-in-using-opennic-for-dns-resolution?atw=1
>> >
>> > Y'all should go answer this. Try to be somewhat neutral though :)
>> >
>> > --- Alex Hanselka alex AT opennicproject.org <mailto:alex AT opennicproject.org>
>> > <mailto:alex AT opennicproject.org>
>> >
>>
>>
>> - --
>> Amrit Panesar
>> OpeNIC .Neo Administrator
>> [ @neo_desktop ]
>
>
> ---
> Alex Hanselka
> alex AT opennicproject.org <mailto:alex AT opennicproject.org>
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
 
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP1reyAAoJENSyafjFACDOeQcH/3i9mwm4HwRjTw4bv0m5oHlA
+2CUn+I8GAyXZ1PHdrVLuywor1bTrrYQglZkAvFm9TvIT7d2oq36ln1fiPY7aua/
LBWqVC7q2jJMtp5VstB9ISsOzeh++bRQbWldivyrx7kixsOORlmkXYDr9TXWUxjG
rf9O3zdVZki3NBLKmdw4nTyDOIQiQkGrAGNuIaJ0+tzSB88bkUyOWgdhkg+ehV3V
P4BmgX3UtrWfyj9gKSTQcmCN/7/pVaQIJhTtj8I5wdcGE77/MtmMHGb8/XfPTyKX
XV6TyLSbBLEJFo7ccKq4Ox/YrT4rj8jv87muKBRbmYgIojIxy3NXbScXv+lUo2U=
=II4t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----