Discuss mailing list

[Amrit Panesar <apanesar AT 4195tech.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
Oh! It looks like you're sending your emails as HTML.
I would recommend you sending it as plain text in order to avoid verification issues

On 6/11/2012 8:26 PM, Alex Hanselka wrote:
> Why is it a bad signature though? Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't... Any ideas from the collective awesome?
>
>
> On Jun 11, 2012, at 10:22 PM, Amrit Panesar wrote:
>
>> Alex:
>> GPG Verification failed on this message,
>> see here: http://i.imgur.com/EQopH.png
>>
>> On 6/11/2012 6:03 PM, Alex Hanselka wrote:
>> > http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/15915/is-there-any-disadvantage-in-using-opennic-for-dns-resolution?atw=1
>> >
>> > Y'all should go answer this. Try to be somewhat neutral though :)
>> >
>> > --- Alex Hanselka alex AT opennicproject.org <mailto:alex AT opennicproject.org>
>> > <mailto:alex AT opennicproject.org>
>> >
>>
>>
>> - --
>> Amrit Panesar
>> OpeNIC .Neo Administrator
>> [ @neo_desktop ]
>
>
> ---
> Alex Hanselka
> alex AT opennicproject.org <mailto:alex AT opennicproject.org>
>


- --
Amrit Panesar
OpeNIC .Neo Administrator
[ @neo_desktop ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
 
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP1refAAoJEA/K84XwmW5aJbMIAKjDmeX2WXHG8H0Sv9UjJzYR
x3GpBz8lpEb53pNyEEAd2i9ij5W+v3dbMRnYltJtEgU1joQ5Ud7Lkt952cFYFme5
07O2vphkB0GA6IDCWPKT+5kKNg0sLUsblhqaIe82RA3Jn/EpweKOwjjxKNxBdag/
3gLAYhBpShDYlbsK2rC8hCBIkmsSuFQXww5IArXCvO6q5QuwBudnA+HEVXpVtus4
PMEwNoA1EEcLmdUVwgZEAVo6LeRQmHQjVSHLngoR59X5BSYMcqm1sjiYRPFM8KfA
kutCDXM7Mw3g7vQV29HLZ39ovHKR/Whw5yODlYzNC95h02b+R9HRQiXHEwQZCrs=
=IQT/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----