Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] Relevant Question

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] Relevant Question


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Alex Hanselka <alex AT opennicproject.org>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Relevant Question
  • Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 22:37:36 -0500

Here. I'm sending this as plain text.

However, the key should be fine... It has the alex@opennicproject email
attached to it supposedly :/

On Jun 11, 2012, at 10:29 PM, Mike wrote:

> On 6/11/2012 11:26 PM, Alex Hanselka wrote:
> > Why is it a bad signature though? Sometimes it works and sometimes it
> doesn't... Any ideas from the collective awesome?
> >
> >
> > On Jun 11, 2012, at 10:22 PM, Amrit Panesar wrote:
> >
> >> Alex:
> >> GPG Verification failed on this message,
> >> see here: http://i.imgur.com/EQopH.png
> >>
> >> On 6/11/2012 6:03 PM, Alex Hanselka wrote:
> >> >
> http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/15915/is-there-any-disadvantage-in-using-opennic-for-dns-resolution?atw=1
> >> >
> >> > Y'all should go answer this. Try to be somewhat neutral though :)
> >> >
> >> > --- Alex Hanselka alex AT opennicproject.org
> <mailto:alex AT opennicproject.org>
> >> > <mailto:alex AT opennicproject.org>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> - --
> >> Amrit Panesar
> >> OpeNIC .Neo Administrator
> >> [ @neo_desktop ]
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Alex Hanselka
> > alex AT opennicproject.org <mailto:alex AT opennicproject.org>
> >
>


---
Alex Hanselka
alex AT opennicproject.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page