Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] Relevant Question

discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] Relevant Question


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Alex Hanselka <alex AT opennicproject.org>
  • To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Relevant Question
  • Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 22:26:17 -0500

Why is it a bad signature though? Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't... Any ideas from the collective awesome? 


On Jun 11, 2012, at 10:22 PM, Amrit Panesar wrote:

Alex:
GPG Verification failed on this message,
see here: http://i.imgur.com/EQopH.png

On 6/11/2012 6:03 PM, Alex Hanselka wrote:
> http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/15915/is-there-any-disadvantage-in-using-opennic-for-dns-resolution?atw=1
>
>  Y'all should go answer this. Try to be somewhat neutral though :)
>
> --- Alex Hanselka alex AT opennicproject.org
> <mailto:alex AT opennicproject.org>
>


- --
Amrit Panesar
OpeNIC .Neo Administrator
[ @neo_desktop ]


---
Alex Hanselka

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page