discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
Re: [opennic-discuss] I love how Brian says "OpenNIC activities" like there's something questionable about it
Chronological Thread
- From: "Alex M (Coyo)" <coyo AT darkdna.net>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] I love how Brian says "OpenNIC activities" like there's something questionable about it
- Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 14:10:21 -0500
On 03/16/2013 01:10 PM, Alex M (Coyo) wrote:
If we constructed our own ISP and eventually achieved teir 2 status, owned and/or hosted our own datacenters, and had one or more residential and business broadband divisions, then the "big boys" as Brian put it would be forced to peer with us, or be held legally accountable for disrupting critical infrastructure and threatening national security.Despite managing to misspell tier, I actually do know what I'm talking about, to a large extent, when it comes to carrier-grade networking.
Many of my friends are senior network engineers or senior datacenter server admins, and I am constantly conversing with them about real-world implementation and operational details.
A friend of mine, who will remain unnamed, because he does love his job, but he does, in fact, work as a senior network engineer for Verizon, and does a whole hell of a lot more than he's technically paid to do. As a result, he has no compunction about filling me in on internal operational and deployment details his company would feel comfortable with being disclosed.
It is highly instructional.
Another one of my better/best friends is a senior server administrator for Softlayer, and is also severely underpaid and unappreciated, and though he's a lot more respectful of corporate privacy, the fact that the federal agencies regularly visit to conduct questionable domestic espionage on American citizens on American soil probably is a factor there.
However, he does disclose some very instructional details in datacenter policies and conduct, operation and deployment, and that is highly useful to me in terms of strategy and possible attack vectors, if push came to shove.
It turns out the "critical infrastructure" that factors into national security is held together with gum and shoestrings. The feds have every reason to worry. It would not take more than an incidental gust of wind to destroy the house of cards that comprises the foundation of the entire American economy, financial networks, manufacturing and industrial communications, including military and intelligence communications. As you probably already know, nearly everything relies on computers, and by extension, the Internet. Even military networks are either tunneled over existing MPLS networks, or use common infrastructure side-by-side with civilian communications networks.
Obviously, through such things as Signaling System 7, carrier grade SIP, and other such systems, all "hardline" PSTN telephony also relies on common communications infrastructure, all of which is ridiculously delicate, insecure, and extremely and perversely easy to undermine and collapse.
It's pretty pathetic, really.
That said, to the extent that the "big boys," as Brian put it, do conduct the operation of their networks, it is very educational to learn of their deployment details and counter-attack response tactics.
It is very helpful strategic information when deploying my own carrier network, especially when it comes to peering at Internet Exchange Points, which turn out to not be distinct buildings, as I was led to believe, but are actually MPLS switching fabrics within existing datacenters, which makes purchasing dark fiber already buried to such locations a lot more affordable and practical.
It is entirely possible to construct, deploy, operate, and fund a regional 10-gigabit active Ethernet fiber-to-the-premises broadband network that would blow anything that could possibly exist clean out of the water. It is entirely possible. All I need to do is hire a few freelance ghostwriters, editors, illustrators, etc. to assist me in writing a comprehensive and impressive business proposal to submit to the largest investor bank that exists and get a business loan sufficient to construct such a network.
I am highly confident that such a venture would not only be financially viable, but extremely successful, as well as essential for the continued relevance of American domestic enterprises in international commerce and trade, as well as American military supremacy.
It is not as though I'm a huge American patriot, but I am perfectly willing to design my network to defend domestic interests if it would mean I could qualify for state and federal grants to assist in funding such a venture.
- [opennic-discuss] I love how Brian says "OpenNIC activities" like there's something questionable about it, Alex M (Coyo), 03/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] I love how Brian says "OpenNIC activities" like there's something questionable about it, Alex M (Coyo), 03/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] I love how Brian says "OpenNIC activities" like there's something questionable about it, Christopher, 03/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] I love how Brian says "OpenNIC activities" like there's something questionable about it, Alex M (Coyo), 03/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] I love how Brian says "OpenNIC activities" like there's something questionable about it, Peter Green, 03/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] I love how Brian says "OpenNIC activities" like there's something questionable about it, Alex M (Coyo), 03/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] I love how Brian says "OpenNIC activities" like there's something questionable about it, Peter Green, 03/16/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] I love how Brian says "OpenNIC activities" like there's something questionable about it, Alex M (Coyo), 03/16/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.