Discuss mailing list

[Peter Green <peter AT greenpete.free>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> What should have happened is nullrouting the server temporarily to 
> mitigate network damage from the amplification attack, informing
> the customer (Brian) of the emergency action, apologizing for the
> necessity, then restoring the route to the customer's server once
> the amplification attack was countered.

Interesting and possibly correct.

I was merely taken aback by your attitude and apparent anger, both of
which I am not judging as such.

It just seemed/s over the top and then to post so much about running a
new I.S.P. (which like it or not comes across as ridiculous) to get
around these terrible ISP's that shut down an open D.N.S. resolvers
all seems over the top, so I wondered if I had missed something when
re-reading the thread.

Maybe it's not over the top???

As for as you not being an OpenNIC op' and therefore your comments do
not reflect on OpenNIC, where you may have a point, I suggest that as
you are posting on an OpenNIC mailing list people 'might' take your
comments and attitude as that of OpenNIC should they not understand
your position.

These, just like yours are my opinions and not that of OpenNIC! ;-)

Peter

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRRNiFAAoJEPBKqeCz72c5+JwH/3lreLIbjNWjPXR82F7cDfjJ
fenbY1HABWGeqeY3aQwQOka2KgTRbaeHA05r/xcSnqtNZOOtLofeHFuNZJPpf8Bm
4/BhgTnuc2XTsr/1ogFe4VZs7MMwntwArN8AXswVyxk7OmxFS/sksHcwp/Ard3cq
jLCmZguWCHbyG2GJ3ks91fbC8Uxbn87vg5dfg9/0LKSp4vs0flh5R/FDO2GrNKV4
om3JJxaDVhWIAkGsEnongvkVAvEn+LobC4cviVonL+jSayYaSWj9xrM9KjglJrSp
KXlRZb6jHmQF2kUXRMDR1uNKwY4K8eIoaQ2zI5ie90P1yJVKkwsKljTYg9eY108=
=5UqI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----