Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

discuss - Re: [opennic-discuss] Alternatives to BIND?

discuss AT

Subject: Discuss mailing list

List archive

Re: [opennic-discuss] Alternatives to BIND?

Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Alex M (Coyo)" <coyo AT>
  • To: discuss AT
  • Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Alternatives to BIND?
  • Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:48:44 -0500

speaking of bind and the unreasonable demands for ram it really shouldn't need, does anyone here have some suggestions on alternatives to bind?

what other authoritative and resolving nameserver daemons would be suggested if one wanted to avoid using bind?

the usecase i have in mind are very large scale deployments (hundreds of thousands of users) such as that seen in large broadband carrier networks.

i'm thinking more in terms of load balanced server clusters behind a pair of static ip addresses assigned by dhcp, dual stack. the servers must support ipv6, and ideally would be amenable to load balancing.

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page