discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: <kennytaylor AT runbox.com>
- To: "discuss" <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient
- Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 08:10:09 -0700 (PDT)
(sorry, hit the send button too early)
Hi Psilo,
I have been doing battle with the isc.org ANY queries for a month or so.
Those queries are all 64 bytes in length, so I set iptables rules to handle
64-byte packets differently. Basically this:
- If packet length = 64, then allow up to 1/second per source IP (matches
isc.org ANY queries)
- Drop all 64-byte packets in excess of above rule
- If packet length = 56, then allow up to 2/second per source IP (matches
root zone ANY queries)
- Drop all 56-byte packets in excess of above rule
- Allow all other UDP DNS traffic
That has limited the attack traffic generated to around 500 kbit/sec, which
is much more manageable. Here's the raw iptables rules I'm using:
## Rate limit 64-byte queries (ANY against isc.org)
iptables -A TO-NS1 -d <dns_server_IP> -p udp --dport 53 -m length --length 64
-m hashlimit --hashlimit-srcmask 32 --hashlimit-mode srcip --hashlimit-upto
1/s --hashli$
iptables -A TO-NS1 -d <dns_server_IP> -p udp --dport 53 -m length --length 64
-j DROP -m comment --comment "Drop all other 64-byte DNS queries"
## Rate limit ANY queries against the root zone
iptables -A TO-NS1 -d <dns_server_IP> -p udp --dport 53 -m length --length 56
-m hashlimit --hashlimit-srcmask 32 --hashlimit-mode srcip --hashlimit-upto
2/s --hashli$
iptables -A TO-NS1 -d <dns_server_IP> -p udp --dport 53 -m length --length 56
-j DROP -m comment --comment "Drop all other 56-byte DNS queries"
Hope that helps,
Kenny
> ----- Start Original Message -----
> Sent: Mon, 20 May 2013 16:23:00 +0200
> From: Psilo <dns AT psilo.org>
> To: "discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org" <discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org>
> Subject: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient
>
> > Dear OpenNIC,
> >
> > I have setup my iptables rules according to the wiki but still getting a
> > lot of unwanted traffic with isc.org and ripe.net.
> > Here is the output of dnstop:
> >
> > Query Name Count %
> > ---------------- --------- ------
> > ripe.net 590 54.2
> > isc.org 406 37.3
> > cnr.it 13 1.2
> > akamaiedge.net 6 0.6
> > 140.in-addr.arpa 6 0.6
> > 125.in-addr.arpa 5 0.5
> > 2-0.pl 5 0.5
> > 86.in-addr.arpa 5 0.5
> > multi-play.pl 4 0.4
> > multi-play.eu 4 0.4
> > net.pl 4 0.4
> > 202.in-addr.arpa 3 0.3
> > 46.in-addr.arpa 3 0.3
> > 91.in-addr.arpa 3 0.3
> >
> > I have setup the following iptables rules which were supposed to block
> > this
> > traffic:
> >
> > # isc.org
> > -A DNSFILTER -p udp -m string --hex-string
> > "|00000000000103697363036f726700|" --algo bm --dport 53 -j DROP
> > # ripe.net
> > -A DNSFILTER -p udp -m string --hex-string
> > "|0000000000010472697065036e6574|" --algo bm --dport 53 -j DROP
> >
> > The "ddos.pl" script is neither efficient.
> >
> > I am getting annoyed by my provider who wants to cut the server because of
> > this traffic.
> >
> > Can you please help me figure what's wrong? Do you have a more aggressive
> > version of this filters?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Psilo
> >
> >
> > --------
> > You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> > You may unsubscribe by emailing
> > discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
> ----- End Original Message -----
----- End Original Message -----
- [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Psilo, 05/20/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, kennytaylor, 05/20/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Jeff Taylor, 05/21/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, kennytaylor, 05/21/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Jeff Taylor, 05/21/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, kennytaylor, 05/21/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Jeff Taylor, 05/21/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, kennytaylor, 05/21/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Jeff Taylor, 05/21/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, kennytaylor, 05/21/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Jeff Taylor, 05/21/2013
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, kennytaylor, 05/20/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Psilo, 05/20/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Julian DeMarchi, 05/22/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Psilo, 05/23/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Alex Hanselka, 05/23/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Hunter 9999, 05/23/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Alex Hanselka, 05/23/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Kenny Taylor, 05/23/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Guillaume Parent, 05/23/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Alex Hanselka, 05/23/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Jamyn Shanley, 05/23/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Hunter 9999, 05/23/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Alex Hanselka, 05/23/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Psilo, 05/23/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Julian DeMarchi, 05/22/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Psilo, 05/20/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, kennytaylor, 05/20/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.