discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Kenny Taylor <kennytaylor AT runbox.com>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 10:25:53 -0700
Host Virtual is one that I have been very happy with. www.vr.org No unplanned downtime in 2+ years, good prices, and 15 locations.
Alex Hanselka <alex AT opennicproject.org> wrote:
On 5/23/2013 9:56 AM, Hunter 9999 wrote:With a Root-Server of Hetzner, for 49€ and up per month, in Germany you have unlimited inbound traffic.
If you have more than 10.000 GB outbound traffic per month your bandwidth will limited from 100 MBit/s to 10 MBit/s .
For 39€ more per month you get an 1GB-Port with 15TB outbound traffic.
--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
Remember, we need servers all around the world not just in Germany :).
Though that is a fantastic price! There are also providers like Linode
that provide a lot of bandwidth, multiple datacenters, and high speeds.
The point is, some locations are more expensive than others! :P
--Alex
P.S. We all realize Linode was hacked recently. We don't need to
discuss that ;)
--------
You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, (continued)
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Jeff Taylor, 05/21/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, kennytaylor, 05/21/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Jeff Taylor, 05/21/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, kennytaylor, 05/21/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, kennytaylor, 05/20/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Psilo, 05/20/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Julian DeMarchi, 05/22/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Psilo, 05/23/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Alex Hanselka, 05/23/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Hunter 9999, 05/23/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Alex Hanselka, 05/23/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Kenny Taylor, 05/23/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Guillaume Parent, 05/23/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Alex Hanselka, 05/23/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Jamyn Shanley, 05/23/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Guillaume Parent, 05/23/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Alex Hanselka, 05/23/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Jeff Taylor, 05/23/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Guillaume Parent, 05/23/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Hunter 9999, 05/23/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Alex Hanselka, 05/23/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Kenny Taylor, 05/23/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Psilo, 05/23/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Julian DeMarchi, 05/22/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Psilo, 05/20/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Jeff Taylor, 05/23/2013
- Re: [opennic-discuss] iptables rules inefficient, Jeff Taylor, 05/21/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.