Discuss mailing list

[Guillaume Parent <gparent AT gparent.org>]

You can't avoid the privacy violation here. Either we monitor our servers and we have to occasionally look at record names and IP addresses, or we don't monitor our servers and some of us get shut down for being internet bastards.

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Alex Nordlund <deep.alexander AT gmail.com> wrote:

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Quinn Wood <wood.quinn.s AT gmail.com> wrote:

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Julian DeMarchi
<julian AT jdcomputers.com.au> wrote:
> Why would someone have 511 A records for @....
>

You've completely missed the point. The point is my distaste with
someone looking through domain requests and the subsequent advice to
block access to one just because it's name looked fishy.

If the type of query was what was being acted on, it would have
already been in a filter and the complaint would have never been made.
It's a privacy violation masquerading as ok because malicious behavior
was found..

How is it a privacy violation if it's found on the person's (I quote) personal closed resolver?

Best regards,

Alex