Discuss mailing list

[vv AT cgs.pw]

I must say, I have a hard time understanding what
English has to do with it. The same executable
extensions are used by MS-Windows users everywhere,
as far as I know, and .js is cross platform. As
for language or cultural preferences, I'm pretty
wide ranging and French is an excellent choice
- especially since it is one of the, so called,
world languages (cf.).

It would seem that you and I agree on many things
regarding a better internet, however, I don't think
that much of that is within our control - nor should
be. The fact remains that people will use whatever
software they want (or more often, given) but we
should still be protective of them simply because
it is the right thing to do.

I don't use Windows or Mac, and for browsing rarely
even use Linux. However, just because I personally
eschew current fashion does not mean that I have any
expectations of other users.

~ Ole

>
> Ole the concerns you express relate to english and, more importantly, 
> using browsers that are tied up with the ican issues  as well as the
> shuttleworth / andreeson (and ms)Â  ca cert scam.
> I mentioned the need for overhauling some software and the browser is one
> part of that overhaul.
> Opennic provides the open (international,  human rights upholding or
> harmonizing if you wish) name to number mapping foundation. The clean
> software still needs to be written but in the end whatever.whatever or
> moi.jesuis  just maps to a number. Theres no semantic management
> involved. That's what makes it opennic.
> Which reminds me, I need to start looking into setting up namserver to
> expand the network.
> :)
>
>
>
> --
> spaesani AT mail.com Monday, 29 August 2016, 07:10PM -04:00 from  vv AT cgs.pw :
>
>>Je suis is nice, but using common extensions for
>>executables seems ill advised to me. I suggest that
>>strings such as .exe, .com, .zip, .js, and .php
>>should be avoided for the sake of protecting people
>>who are not so security savvy and may be using some
>>badly designed operating system of which they also
>>have little understanding. Like all decisions, it is
>>a good idea to consider "what if" before committing.
>>I submit that when choosing an OpenNIC TLD we should
>>also consider the greater internet community.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Ole Juul
>>
>>
>>>
>>> well im not sure if you're asking a question but along those lines. com
>>> could be confused with a microsoft com object. it woud really depend
>>> what
>>> the tld operator and then all the registrants have in mind. or rather
>>> what
>>> intonations or inferences they give to it.
>>> remember this is opennic and not the ietf iso ican etc..
>>> unlike the iso ietf ica iana etc.
>>> opennic does not violate human rights  nor international laws and
>>> treaties by imposing the english language on foreign countries  and
>>> prohibiting intercontinental and cross country internet communications
>>> between  family friends  and businesses 'unless its done in
>>> english and
>>> extortionist sums are paid.. Its quite a violation.
>>> Of course with the IS issues its,most likely not of huge,concern at the
>>> UN
>>> level  which of course makes it that much more :insidious.
>>> If  a  militarily  backed  french or german group did the
>>> same (those
>>> organisations are us military backed through the us depatment of
>>> commerce)   in the same subversive fashion  I'm sure some
>>> Americans
>>> would be crying freedom of expression in their country and most likely
>>> bring up the international law violations at the UN.
>>> Of,course the french,  germans russians etc..
>>> don' t do this and neither of course does opennic.
>>> At opennic you can request jesuis. (Je suis).
>>> Which.means 'I Am' in french.
>>> You might want to do : .choa (good by and  take care)
>>> It's truly intemational and harmonizing.
>>> More people should know about it.
>>> One other thing: the iso ietf n co software stack is as hostile as
>>> those
>>> organisation's boards and members.
>>> It needs to be overhauled at a certain level for opennic and other
>>> organisation's like it to get off the ground and truly set the internet
>>> as
>>> an international unifying tool and not an english imposition and
>>> extortion
>>> tool that it has been for 20 years.
>>> .sp
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>  spaesani AT mail.com Monday, 29 August 2016, 09:46AM -04:00 from Daniel
>>> Quintiliani  danq AT runbox.com :
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>What does "JS" stand for? Like I suggested it's a bad idea to enter
>>>> ".js"
>>>> into an address bar since it might get confused with malware.
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>
>>>>-Dan Q
>>>>
>>>>On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 22:43:31 +0300,  spaesani AT mail.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for clarifying the source of the policy but I reviewed
>>>>> opennics
>>>>> policy for tlds and see that there is no 2 letter restriction
>>>>> thus  my
>>>>> motion to review the policy has no premise and is invalid.
>>>>> So no need for a vote on that issue.
>>>>> As for .JS I allteady voted in light of opennic's policies.
>>>>> Thanks again for clarifyng.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>--------
>>>>You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>>>>You may unsubscribe by emailing
>>>>  discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>>
>>>
>>> --------
>>> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>>> You may unsubscribe by emailing
>>>  discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--------
>>You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
>>You may unsubscribe by emailing
>> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing
> discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>