discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
Subject: Discuss mailing list
List archive
- From: Verax <verax AT 8chan.co>
- To: discuss AT lists.opennicproject.org
- Subject: Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS
- Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 20:17:39 -0400
I agree with this. Messing with standards never ends well.
One letter TLDs might be an interesting idea, if you want short URLs for
some reason, but I agree with 2-letter TLDs being off-limits.
Regards,
Verax
Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> Not all two letter strings are country codes, but all ISO-3166 country
> codes are (and will be) two-letter strings. Reserving two letter TLDs
> as ccTLDs is *not* an ICANN policy--it is an IETF policy codified in the
> RFCs before ICANN existed.
>
> NO!
>
> No to .js and double NO to deviating from the RFCs on ccTLDs. All
> potential ccTLDs should remain reserved.
>
> spaesani AT mail.com wrote:
>>
>> Not all 2 letters are country codes. From my view ICAN 's policies
>> don't need to be repeated where they incur unnecessary restrictions.
>>
>> I move for a review of that condition of the policy.
>>
>> --
>> spaesani AT mail.com
>>
>> Friday, 26 August 2016, 04:35AM -04:00 from Tim Groeneveld tim AT timg.ws
>> <mailto:tim AT timg.ws>:
>>
>> Two letter TLDs are reserved for country codes.
>>
>>
>> ---- On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:19:24 +1000 * 1073384916 AT qq.com
>> </compose?To=1073384916 AT qq.com> * wrote ----
>>
>> We Want to propose the TLD .JS, and the .JS is going to be
>> according all OpenNic Policies .
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------
> You are a member of the OpenNIC Discuss list.
> You may unsubscribe by emailing discuss-unsubscribe AT lists.opennicproject.org
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, 唐隆君, 08/26/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, Daniel Quintiliani, 08/26/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, Tim Groeneveld, 08/26/2016
- Re[2]: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, spaesani, 08/27/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, Paginas Web y Servidores :: Ventas, 08/27/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, vv, 08/27/2016
- Re[2]: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, spaesani, 08/28/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, Paginas Web y Servidores :: Ventas, 08/27/2016
- Re[2]: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, spaesani, 08/27/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, Jacob Bachmeyer, 08/27/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, Verax, 08/27/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, vv, 08/27/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, Jacob Bachmeyer, 08/27/2016
- Re[2]: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, spaesani, 08/29/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, Daniel Quintiliani, 08/29/2016
- Re[2]: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, spaesani, 08/29/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, vv, 08/29/2016
- Re[2]: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, spaesani, 08/29/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, vv, 08/29/2016
- Re[2]: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, spaesani, 08/29/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, Daniel Quintiliani, 08/29/2016
- Re: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, Jacob Bachmeyer, 08/27/2016
- Re[2]: [opennic-discuss] Proposal the TLD .JS, spaesani, 08/27/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.